金沙江干热河谷不同区段植被恢复对水土保持特征的影响

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2024031

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (960 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Background Severe soil erosion in the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River causes significant challenges to the zone’s ecological security and functions, seriously affecting social and economic activities. Investigating the soil and water conservation characteristics and influencing factors of natural forests, planted forests, and savanna of valley type in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River is crucial for soil and water conservation and ecological restoration in this zone. Methods In this study, 22 sampling sites were established in the upper reaches, 13 sampling sites in the middle reaches, and 12 sampling sites in the lower reaches. Data were collected through comprehensive field investigations, sample collection, and subsequent laboratory analysis, and the soil and water conservation capacity characteristics and influencing factors of natural forests, planted forests, and savanna of valley type in the upper, middle, and lower reaches were studied. Results 1) Natural forests show the best characteristics in terms of surface vegetation, soil porosity, and soil water-holding capacity, resulting in the strongest soil and water conservation ability. In contrast, savanna of valley type are of poor surface vegetation growth, a thin litter layer, low soil porosity, and weak soil water-holding capacity, making them more susceptible to severe soil erosion from rain. Therefore, the soil and water conservation capacity under different vegetation types is natural forests > planted forests > savanna of valley type. 2) Soil density gradually increases from upstream to downstream, while soil porosity, soil water-holding capacity and soil drainage capacity gradually decrease from upstream to downstream. Therefore, the soil and water conservation capacity in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River is as follows: upper reaches > middle reaches > lower reaches, the difference in soil water conservation capacity between the middle and lower reaches is not significant (P > 0.05). 3) The characteristics of soil porosity and soil water-holding capacity of the surface layer (0–15 cm) are superior to the subsurface layer (15–30 cm) in different sections of the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River. Therefore, the soil and water conservation capacity of surface and subsurface layers soils in the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River is as follows: surface layer > subsurface layer. Conclusions The soil under planted forests shows substantial improvement compared to savanna of valley type in terms of vegetation growth state, coverage, soil porosity, and soil water-holding capacity. This indicates that artificial afforestation measures effectively promote soil and water conservation and ecological restoration in the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River, indicating that it is an effective measure for preventing and controlling soil and water loss.

Key words： vegetation recovery water and soil conservation soil porosity soil water-holding capacity Dry-Hot Valley

Received: 11 March 2024

PACS:

S714.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	RUAN Changming
	MA Shaodong
	WANG Bihai
	WANG Meng
	OU Chaorong
	SUN Yongyu
	ZHANG Chunhua

Cite this article:

RUAN Changming,MA Shaodong,WANG Bihai, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil and water conservation characteristics in different zones of the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River[J]. SSWC, 2025, 23(1): 90-101.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2024031 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2025/V23/I1/90

[1]	张荣祖. 横断山区干旱河谷[M]. 北京：科学出版社，1992：1.ZHANG Rongzu. The dry valleys of the Hengduan mountains region[M]. Beijing：Science Press，1992：1.
[2]	孙永玉，欧朝蓉，邓志华. 加强金沙江干热河谷区生态保护与修复工作的思考[J]. 社会主义论坛，2023（10）：34.SUN Yongyu，OU Chaorong，DENG Zhihua. Consideration on strengthening ecological protection and restoration in the dry-hot valley area of Jinsha River[J]. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House，2023（10）：34.
[3]	吴云飞. 金沙江干热河谷区水土流失成因及防治对策[J]. 山西水土保持科技，2014（2）：4.WU Yunfei. Causes of soil and water loss and countermeasures in dry and hot valley of Jinsha River[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi，2014（2）：4.
[4]	李昆，刘方炎，杨振寅，等. 中国西南干热河谷植被恢复研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 世界林业研究，2011，24（4）：55.LI Kun，LIU Fangyan，YANG Zhenyin，et al. Study status and trends of vegetation restoration of dry-hot valley in Southwest China[J]. World Forestry Research，2011，24（4）：55.
[5]	张雄一，邵全琴，宁佳，等. 三北工程区植被恢复对土壤风蚀的影响及植被恢复潜力研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报，2022，24（11）：2153.ZHANG Xiongyi，SHAO Quanqin，NING Jia，et al. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil wind erosion and vegetation restoration potential in the Three-North Afforestation Program[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science，2022，24（11）：2153.
[6]	WEN Xin，DENG Xiangzheng，ZHANG Fan. Scale effects of vegetation restoration on soil and water conservation in a semi-arid region in China：Resources conservation and sustainable management[J]. Resources，Conservation and Recycling，2019，151：104474.
[7]	李强. 金沙江干热河谷生态环境特征与植被恢复关键技术研究[D]. 西安：西安理工大学，2008：1.LI Qiang. Researches on eco-environment features and vegetation restoration technologies in Dry-Hot Valley of Jinshajiang River[D]. Xi'an：Xi'an University of Technology，2008：1.
[8]	段青松，王金霞，杨旸，等. 金沙江干热河谷乡土草本植物根系提高土体抗剪强度及其模型预测[J]. 中国水土保持科学，2017，15（4）：87.DUAN Qingsong，WANG Jinxia，YANG Yang，et al. Soil anti-shear strength enhancement by indigenous herbaceous roots in Dry-hot Valley of Jinsha River and its modeling prediction[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation，2017，15（4）：87.
[9]	余杭，高若允，杨文嘉，等. 干热河谷优势草本植物叶片、根系与土壤碳氮磷含量及其关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报，2022，28（3）：727.YU Hang，GAO Ruoyun，YANG Wenjia，et al. Carbon，nitrogen，and phosphorus contents of leaf，root，and soil and their relationships in dominant herbaceous plants in dry-hot valley[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology，2022，28（3）：727.
[10]	阮长明，杜寿康，孙永玉，等. 金沙江干热河谷不同区段土壤碳氮磷化学计量和酶活性研究[J]. 环境科学研究，2022，35（11）：2486.RUAN Changming，DU Shoukang，SUN Yongyu，et al. Stoichiometry of soil carbon，nitrogen and phosphorus and soil enzyme activity at various reaches of the Dry-Hot Valley of Jinsha River[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences，2022，35（11）：2486.
[11]	阮长明，唐国勇，杜寿康，等. 金沙江干热河谷不同海拔土壤碳氮磷化学计量和酶活性研究[J]. 西南农业学报，2023，36（11）：2464.RUAN Changming，TANG Guoyong，DU Shoukang，et al. Stoichiometry of soil carbon，nitrogen，phosphorus and enzyme activities at various elevations in the Dry-Hot Valley of the Jinsha River[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2023，36（11）：2464.
[12]	LIU Yu，ZHAO Lirong，LIU Yifan，et al. Restoration of a hillslope grassland with an ecological grass species （Elymus tangutorum） favors rainfall interception and water infiltration and reduces soil loss on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Catena，2022，219：106632.
[13]	王淑春，程然然，杜盛. 黄土丘陵区2种典型林分降雨分配特征及其主要影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报，2022，36（3）：173.WANG Shuchun，CHENG Ranran，DU Sheng. Characteristics and main influencing factors of rainfall partitioning in two typical forests in the loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation，2022，36（3）：173.
[14]	HAO Haoxin，QIN Jiahui，SUN Zhaoxiang，et al. Erosion-reducing effects of plant roots during concentrated flow under contrasting textured soils[J]. Catena，2021，203：105378.
[15]	HAN Dandan，DENG Jingcheng，GU Chaojun，et al. Effect of shrub-grass vegetation coverage and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield under simulated rainfall[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research，2021，36（1）：29.
[16]	王晨光，曹文华，马波，等. 不同根系构型草本与灌木复合对土壤饱和导水率的影响因素分析及模拟[J]. 水土保持通报，2023，43（4）：10.WANG Chenguang，CAO Wenhua，MA Bo，et al. Analysis and simulation of factors affecting soil saturated hydraulic conductivity by combinations of grasses and shrubs with different root configurations[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation，2023，43（4）：10.
[17]	王霖娇，汪攀，盛茂银. 西南喀斯特典型石漠化生态系统土壤养分生态化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报，2018，38（18）：6580.WANG Linjiao，WANG Pan，SHENG Maoyin. Stoichiometric characteristics of soil nutrient elements and its influencing factors in typical karst rocky desertification ecosystems，Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica，2018，38（18）：6580.
[18]	杨倩，刘目兴，王苗苗，等. 武汉市典型绿地植被类型对表层土壤入渗和持水性能的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境，2019，28（6）：1324.YANG Qian，LIU Muxing，WANG Miaomiao，et al. Characterization of surface soil water infiltration and retention capacity in urban green space of Wuhan city[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin，2019，28（6）：1324.
[19]	余梦舒，李雅平，刘青，等. 不同结构城市绿地土壤渗透性影响研究[J]. 江西农业学报，2021，33（6）：49.YU Mengshu，LI Yaping，LIU Qing，et al. Study on influence of soil permeability of urban green space with different structure[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi，2021，33（6）：49.
[20]	杨玥，方建波，刘小玲，等. 广东流溪河5种林分的枯落物与土壤持水性[J]. 林业与环境科学，2018，34（2）：90.YANG Yue，FANG Jianbo，LIU Xiaoling，et al. Water-holding capacity of litter and soil in five types of forests in Liuxihe[J]. Forestry and Environmental Science，2018，34（2）：90.
[21]	李源，宋维峰，马建刚. 中国西南水梯田土壤水分特性研究：以哈尼梯田为例[J]. 水土保持学报，2021，35（2）：160.LI Yuan，SONG Weifeng，MA Jiangang. Soil moisture characteristics of water terrace in Southwest China ：A case study of Hani Terraces[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation，2021，35（2）：160.
[22]	姚月锋，何文，曾丹娟. 漓江流域洪涝灾害风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报，2018，38（2）：122.YAO Yuefeng，HE Wen，ZENG Danjuan. Assessment of flood risk in Lijiang River watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation，2018，38（2）：122.
[23]	靳小莲，赵巍，李梦迪，等. 黄土高原退耕还草土壤水分对植物地上部化学计量特征的影响[J]. 水土保持研究，2022，29（2）：57.JIN Xiaolian，ZHAO Wei，LI Mengdi，et al. Effects of soil moisture on the stoichiometric characteristics of aboveground plants following conversion of farmland to grassland on the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation，2022，29（2）：57.