|
|
Chemical changes of canopy precipitation in dry and rainy seasons of typical forest in Nanling Mountains,North Guangdong |
WANG Ning1,2, ZHANG Weiqiang1, HUANG Fangfang1, SU Zhiyao2, WU Guozhang1, GAN Xianhua1 |
1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization/Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 510520, Guangzhou, China; 2. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] With the change of precipitation pattern under the background of global climate change, there are seasonal differences in the chemical content of throughfall and stemflow. The ion concentration of throughfall and stemflow showed a bimodal pattern, and the ion concentration was basically lower in the rainy season than in the dry season. The dry and rainy seasons in the subtropical region are distinct, which may make the chemical characteristics of precipitation in the subtropical forest canopy show seasonal differences. Based on this, this study relies on the Guangdong Nanling Forest Ecological Station to analyze the chemical characteristics of precipitation in typical forest canopy in this area, and compare the response of atmospheric precipitation chemical composition to different types of forest canopy in dry and rainy seasons. [Methods] Water samples were collected immediately after the precipitation events in March, May, July 2022 and January 2023. The detection indexes were pH, TN, TP, NH+4-N, NO-3-N, Cu, Cd, Pb and Cr6+. The mass concentration and flux of chemical substances in different hydrological components of typical forest were calculated, and the difference of chemical substance concentration in different hydrological components was compared by one-way analysis of variance. [Results] The results showed that the atmospheric precipitation in the dry season is acidic, and the pH value after the evergreen broad-leaved forest canopy is 6.82, and the acidity of the precipitation is buffered. The chemical input of atmospheric precipitation is mainly nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients, and the input of heavy metals only accounts for 1.19%-1.44%. The total chemical input of atmospheric precipitation in the rainy season is higher than that in the dry season, which was 4 198.4 g/hm2 in the rainy season and 3 251.5 g/hm2 in the dry season. In the dry season, the canopy neutralization of evergreen broad-leaved forest is better than that of the other two forests. The concentrations of chemical substances in the throughfall and stemflow of the three forests in the dry season are higher than those in the rainy season. In the dry season, the canopy of the three forest stands show leaching effect on the chemical composition of precipitation. In the rainy season, only the coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest (having bamboo) canopy has obvious chemical leaching effect on precipitation. The leaching degree of Cu in canopy precipitation is extremely high, and the net leaching deposition ratio is between 1.22 and 16.4. [Conclusions] In this study, the hydrological process monitoring of different forest communities in Nanling Mountains is carried out. However, due to the randomness of precipitation events and the great influence of complex environment in the field on hydrological observation, the conclusions obtained by using precipitation water quality data in different months need to be further observed and verified for a long time, and its internal mechanism and leaching law need to be further discussed.
|
Received: 10 October 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
CHEN S, CAO R, YOSHITAKE S, et al. Ecological significance of throughfall and stemflow to the carbon cycle in forest ecosystems[M]//LI F, AWAYA Y, KAGEYAMA K, et al. River Basin Environment: Evaluation, Management and Conservation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022:29.
|
[2] |
吕爱锋, 王蕾, 曲波. 我国植被冠层降水截留研究进展[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2022,20(4): 724. Lü Aifeng, WANG Lei, QU Bo.Research progress of vegetation canopy interception in China[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2022,20(4): 724.
|
[3] |
汪水前. 南方水土流失区马尾松对降雨再分配的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2022,20(2): 99. WANG Shuiqian. Effects ofPinus massoniana in soil erosion area in South China on rainfall redistribution[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,20(2): 99.
|
[4] |
胡婉榕, 胥超, 熊德成, 等. 中亚热带森林两种林型对4种盐基离子随降水分配动态的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2022,28(6): 1578. HU Wanrong, XU Chao, XIONG Decheng, et al. Effects of two forest types on the dynamics of four base cations along with rainfall partitioning in middle subtropical forests[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2022,28(6): 1578.
|
[5] |
刘宗君, 胡明锋, 谢勇, 等. 南岭保护区主要树种的空间分布格局[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023,44(1): 98. LIU Zongjun, HU Mingfeng, XIE Yong, et al. Spatial distribution pattern of dominant tree species in Nanling nature reserve[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2023,44(1): 98.
|
[6] |
薛婷, 盛后财, 石磊. 城市樟子松人工林降雨分配过程中养分变化特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021,49(3): 15. XUE Ting, SHENG Houcai, SHI Lei. Variation characteristics of nutrient fluxes rainfall distribution processes in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation of an urban area[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2021,49(3): 15.
|
[7] |
AVILA A, AGUILLAUME L, IZQUIETA-ROJANO S, et al. Quantitative study on nitrogen deposition and canopy retention in Mediterranean evergreen forests[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017,24(34): 26213.
|
[8] |
杨双娜, 袁朝祥, 朱贵青, 等. 哀牢山常绿阔叶林穿透雨与树干茎流水质特征研究[J]. 西部林业科学, 2020,49(5): 109. YANG Shuangna, YUAN Chaoxiang, ZHU Guiqing, et al. Water quality characteristics of penetrating rain and trunk stream in Ailaoshan evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2020,49(5): 109.
|
[9] |
肖以华, 陈步峰, 潘勇军, 等. 广州帽峰山常绿阔叶林森林生态系统水文环境效应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(3): 78. XIAO Yihua, CHEN Bufeng, PAN Yongjun, et al. Effects of hydrological environment on tropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in Maofengsan Mountain of Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010,38(3): 78.
|
[10] |
陈晓滢, 植秋滢, 杨肖, 等. 广州市3种典型绿化树冠层降水再分配对重金属元素沉降的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021,40(7): 1937. CHEN Xiaoying, ZHI Qiuying, YANG Xiao, et al. The effects of rainfall partitioning on heavy metal deposition for three typical urban tree species in Guangzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021,40(7): 1937.
|
[11] |
高晓晓, 张胜利, 邱志斌, 等. 秦岭火地塘3种主要林型林冠层对不同pH值降雨水质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3): 103. GAO Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Shengli, QIU Zhibin, et al. Effects of canopy of three main forest types on rainfall water quality with different pH values in Huoditang forest area of Qinling Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,41(3): 103.
|
[12] |
盛后财, 李奕, 李华. 城市森林冠层对大气金属输入的影响[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2023,45(7): 935. SHENG Houcai, LI Yi, LI Hua.Effects of urban forest canopy on the atmospheric metal inputs[J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2023,45(7): 935.
|
[13] |
马明, 孙涛, 李定凯, 等. 缙云山常绿阔叶林湿沉降过程中不同空间层次水质变化特征[J]. 环境科学, 2017,38(12): 5056. MA Ming, SUN Tao, LI Dingkai, et al. Dynamics of the water quality in a broad-leaf evergreen forest at different spatial levels on Jinyun Mountain[J]. Environmental Science, 2017,38(12): 5056.
|
[14] |
康希睿, 张涵丹, 王小明, 等. 北亚热带3种森林群落对大气湿沉降重金属的调控[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(6): 2107. KANG Xirui, ZHANG Handan, WANG Xiaoming, et al.Distribution of heavy metals in precipitation by three forest communities in northern subtropical region of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(6): 2107.
|
[15] |
ZHANG Y, WANG X, PAN Y, et al. Global quantitative synthesis of effects of biotic and abiotic factors on stemflow production in woody ecosystems[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2021,30(8): 1713.
|
[16] |
李佳, 李巍, 侯锦湘, 等. 贵州地区酸雨作用下典型森林植被冠层淋溶规律研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2010,30(10): 1297. LI Jia, LI Wei, HOU Jinxiang, et al.Typical forests' leaching characteristics during acid rain in Guizhou[J]. China Environmental Science, 2010,30(10): 1297.
|
[17] |
刘睿奇, 张秋良, 赵亚萍. 大兴安岭兴安落叶松林不同水文调节层对水质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023,38(3): 55. LIU Ruiqi, ZHANG Qiuliang, ZHAO Yaping. Effects of different hydrological regulation layers on water quality of Larix gmelinii forest in the Daxing'an Mountains[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023,38(3): 55.
|
|
|
|