|
|
|
| Fortification design of slope runoff as well as interception and drainage system for pipeline engineering in mountain area |
| ZHOU Dapeng1, LUO Yang1, GE Hua2, GUO Hanyu1, WANG Tangyu1 |
1. China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corp. Southwest Company, 610095, Chengdu, China;
2. Pipe China Southwest Pipeline Company, 610095, Chengdu, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract [Background]Water damage is the main disaster that threatens the safety of pipelines in mountain. Runoff scouring of pipeline construction scope is an important manifestation of water damage. Although some researches have been carried out on prevention and control of slope runoff, however, problems of interception and drainage of construction scope of pipeline in mountain still often occurs, such as inadequate protection, excessive protection or unreasonable protection. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a systematic study on design standards and protective measures system of slope runoff of construction scope in mountainous areas. [Methods]We selected highway, railway, municipal, water and soil conservation, oil and gas pipeline industry design standards and specifications for comparative analysis on interception and drainage of slope runoff. Then we selected 4 typical along-laying slopes and 4 typical cross-laying slopes of the mountain pipeline from Puning, Guangdong, Beilun, Zhejiang, Cangxi, Sichuan, Tongnan, and Congqing in the southern humid area to carry out hydrologic calculation and discuss the design essentials of interception and drainage system.[Results]1) Different design standards of interception and drainage are formulated according to different engineering grades and protection objects in highway, railway, municipal, water and soil conservation. 2)Simplified rational formula shall be adopted for hydrologic calculation of slope runoff, and the calculation accuracy can be improved by using local rainstorm atlas parameters.3) According to the calculation, the slope runoff of pipeline section with equal length in cross-laying slope is 8-10 times that of along-laying slope in southern humid area. For along-laying slope, the interval flow is 0.01-0.02 m3/s with an interval of 25-30 m, and the intercepting ditches or water blocking stems can be used to intercept runoff. The durability requirements for such structures are relatively low. For cross-laying slope, the interval flow is 0.12-0.20 m3/s with an interval of 30 m, and the interval flow is 0.19-0.34 m3/s with an interval of 50m. The intercepting ditches shall be set at the inner side of cross-laying construction scope, and the runoff shall be introduced to the downhill side based on microtopography. Such structures shall be considered to have certain durability and should adopt masonry, concrete and other structural forms. 4)In arid and semi dry areas in North China, fish scale pits, horizontal ditches and other land consolidation methods can be used to regulate slope runoff.[Conclusions]It is suggested that the design recurrence interval of flood for along-laying slope should be 3-5 years, that of cross-laying slope should be 20-30 years for pipelines with DN 800 and above, 15-20 years for pipelines with DN 200-DN 800, and 10-15 years for pipelines less than DN 200. The interception and drainage system on construction scope should be formulated according to the characteristics of cross-laying slope and along-laying slope in mountainous areas.This study can provide reference for the design and construction of hydraulic protection and water and soil conservation of pipeline projects in mountainous areas.
|
|
Received: 02 September 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
吴忠良.长输油气管道水工保护效能评价方法[J].油气储运,2014,33(5):538.WU Zhongliang.Efficiency evaluation method for hydro technical prevention project of long-distance oil & gas pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2014,33(5):538.
|
| [2] |
施宁,李亮亮,宋小晖,等.管道水工效能评价方法优化及实践[J].油气储运,2018,37(12):1341.SHI Ning,LI Liangliang,SONG Xiaohui,et al.Optimization and practice of pipeline hydraulic efficiency evaluation method[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2018,37(12):1341.
|
| [3] |
李朝,史航.山区地段长输管道线路设计要点[J].油气储运,2002,21(12):27.LI Chao,SHI Hang.The design key point on mountainous pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2002,21(12):27.
|
| [4] |
张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面径流水动力学特性[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):34.ZHANG Letao,GAO Zhaoliang,TIAN Hongwei.Hydro-dynamic characteristics of steep slope runoff of engineering accumulation under simulated runoff conditions[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(4):34.
|
| [5] |
胡道华.陕京输气管道建设中水工保护的研究与实践[J].油气储运,1998,17(10):24.HU Daohua.Study and practice of hydraulic protection in construction of Shaanjing gas transmission pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,1998,17(10):24.
|
| [6] |
李永军,张小龙.靖边-咸阳输油管道水工保护技术措施[J].油气储运,2002,21(8):29.LI Yongjun,ZHANG Xiaolong.The hydrotechnological protection technology in Jingbian-Xianyang oil pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2002,21(8):29.
|
| [7] |
王鸿,朱艳君.塑料排水板在土石山区坡地管道中的应用[J].油气储运,2000,19(5):35.WANG Hong,ZHU Yanjun.The application of plastic drain board in pipeline of mountainous slopes[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2000,19(5):35.
|
| [8] |
王鸿,朱艳君.土工格室在长输管道水力侵蚀防护中的应用[J].油气储运,2002,21(11):34.WANG Hong,ZHU Yanjun.The application of cellular confinement system in anti-hydraulic erosion of long distance pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2002,21(11):34.
|
| [9] |
林铭玉.生态袋防护措施在山区长输管道水工保护中的应用[J].油气田地面工程,2018,37(1):86.LIN Mingyu.Application of the ecological bags conservation measure in hydraulic protection for long distance transportation pipelines in mountain areas[J].Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering,2018,37(1):86.
|
| [10] |
陈强.长输管道中不同地形下选取不同的焊接工艺对造价影响分析[J].清洗世界,2020,36(7):44.CHEN Qiang.Analysis on the influence of different welding processes on the cost of long-distance pipeline under different terrain[J].Cleaning World,2020,36(7):44.
|
| [11] |
陈枫.小汇水面积设计洪水计算方法探讨[J].广东水利水电,2019(6):63.CHEN Feng.Discussion on calculation method of design flood for small catchment area[J].Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower,2019(6):63.
|
| [12] |
伍斌.坡面水系工程水文水利计算[J].亚热带水土保持,2006,18(2):41.WU Bin.Hydrological and hydraulic calculation of slope water system project[J].Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation,2006,18(2):41.
|
| [13] |
王博.城镇小汇水面积设计洪水计算方法比较[J].中国农村水利水电,2009(10):84.WANG Bo.Analysis on the influence of different welding processes on the cost of long-distance pipeline under different terrain[J].China Rural Water And Hydropower,2009(10):84.
|
| [14] |
邹小阳,周旺,孙文俊,等.工程堆积体土壤侵蚀影响因素国内研究进展[J].东北农业科学,2021,46(1):57.ZOU Xiaoyang,ZHOU Wang,SUN Wenjun,et al.Research progress on influencing factors of soil erosion of engineering accumulation body in China[J].Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences,2021,46(1):57.
|
| [15] |
纪政全,吕刚,李坤衡,等.辽西春季解冻期褐土工程堆积体坡面侵蚀特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2022,20(3):62.JI Zhengquan,LÜ Gang,LI Kunheng,et al.Slope erosion characteristics of brown soil engineering accumulation in spring thawing period in western Liaoning[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,20(3):62.
|
| [16] |
WANG G Y,JOHN I,YANG Y S,et al.Extent of soil erosion and surface runoff associated with large-scale infrastructure development in Fujian province,China[J].Catena,2012,89(1):22.
|
| [17] |
史东梅,蒋光毅,彭旭东,等.不同土石比的工程堆积体边坡径流侵蚀过程[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(17):152.SHI Dongmei,JIANG Guangyi,PENG Xudong,et al.Runoff erosion process on slope of engineering accumulation with different soil-rock ratio[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2015,31(17):152.
|
| [18] |
牛耀彬,高照良,李永红,等.工程堆积体坡面细沟形态发育及其与产流产沙量的关系[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(19):154.NIU Yaobin,GAO Zhaoliang,LI Yonghong,et al.Rill morphology development of engineering accumulation and its relationship with runoff and sediment[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2016,32(19):154.
|
| [19] |
丁文斌,史东梅,何文健,等.放水冲刷条件下工程堆积体边坡径流侵蚀水动力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(18):153.DING Wenbin,SHI Dongmei,HE Wenjian,et al.Accumulation erosion under side slope runoff erosion process in field scouring experiment[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2016,32(18):153.
|
|
|
|
