农林开发活动时空分布及水土流失特征

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2020.05.013

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1903 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] In recent years, due to the improvements of landuse transfer policies, the development of agroforestry activities had been enhanced significantly. However, the increasing of agroforestry activities aggravated soil and water loss, especially in hilly and mountain areas. Therefore, it became very important to understand the patterns and relationships between the agroforestry activities and its related soil and water loss. [Methods] Rongcheng, the Key Control Area of Soil Erosion in Shandong province, was selected as the study area. In this area, remote sensing, field investigation, and soil erosion simulation were used to analyze the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of agroforestry activities. In addition, the effects of agroforestry activities on soil and water loss and its related environmental factors were quantified in this study. [Results] 1) From 2014 to 2017, there were 36 plots (>2 hm², max.=62.5 hm², and min.=2.58 hm²) disturbed by agroforestry activities with a total area of 591.33 hm² involving 11 administrative districts. 2) Within the disturbed 36 plots, agroforestry activities resulted in the changes in engineering practices, micro-topographies (slope and slope length), and understory vegetation cover. Among those changes, the low-standard terraced farmland was transferred to high-benefit economic forest such as orchard with higher slope (mainly 2°-5°, followed by 5°-8°, and >8° accounting for 12%, and max.=19°), and longer slope length (avg.=300-500 m and max.=750 m). The vegetation coverage changed from high coverage to low coverage, and then steadily increased. 3) The agroforestry activities aggravated the severity of soil and water loss in those disturbed plots, and the intensity of soil erosion jumped from slight level to light and medium levels. Moreover, the erosion modulus of post disturbed plots increased 6-11 times than prior disturbed plots, and the disturbed plots did not recover to the original conditions even after a 4-year recovery period. [Conclusions] Therefore, the increasing of agroforestry activities may accelerate the soil and water loss through destroying the understory vegetation cover and modifying local micro-topographies, especially in hilly and mountain areas. This research revealed the realistic situations and difficulties to restore the disturbed areas of agroforestry activities. Moreover, for the disturbed areas, more practical managements and policies need to be implemented to control agroforestry activities and soil erosion.

Key words： agroforestry activities disturbance pattern spot soil erosion remote sensing monitoring CSLE model

Received: 28 December 2018

PACS:

S157.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SONG Yuanyuan
	XING Xianshuang
	QI Fei
	LIU Xia
	DONG Mingming
	WU Zhenyu
	LI Xiang
	YAO Xiaoyou

Cite this article:

SONG Yuanyuan,XING Xianshuang,QI Fei, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of agroforestry activities and its related characteristics of soil and water loss[J]. SSWC, 2020, 18(5): 104-111.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2020.05.013 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2020/V18/I5/104

[1]	姚孝友,袁利,吴迪,等. 土地流转后农业经营模式转变下的小流域综合治理[J].中国水土保持, 2015 (9):15. YAO Xiaoyou, YUAN Li, WU Di, et al. Integrated management of small watershed under the change of agricultural management model after land transfer[J].Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2015 (9):15.
[2]	全丽, 黄玉, 闫凯. 探究如何更好地进行土地整理[J].山西农经, 2016(3):36. QUAN Li, HUANG Yu, YAN Kai. Explore how to better land consolidation[J].Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2016(3):36.
[3]	刘世梁, 安南南, 王军. 土地整理对生态系统服务影响的评价研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(9):1010. LIU Shiliang, AN Nannan, WANG Jun. Research progress on the effects of land consolidation on ecosystem services[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(9):1010.
[4]	钟恢明, 周庆华, 高山明, 等. 农林开发项目环境影响评价的探讨[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 6(1):85. ZHONG Huiming, ZHOU Qinghua, GAO Shanming, et al. On environmental impact assessment about agricultural development project[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2007, 6(1):85.
[5]	金相灿, 卢少勇, 王骥, 等. 农林业开发项目环境影响评价研究综述[J].安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(16):80. JIN Xiangcan, LU Shaoyong, WANG Ji, et al. Research overviews on environmental impact assessment of agro-forestry development projects[J]. Anhui Agricultural Bulletin, 2009, 15(16):80.
[6]	王林. 环境影响评价在林业发展中的作用[J].现代农业科技, 2011(22):226. WANG Lin. Role of environmental impact assessment in forestry development[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(22):226.
[7]	姜德文. 开发建设项目水土保持损益分析指标体系研究[J].中国水土保持, 2008(1):37. JIANG Dewen. Research on the index system of soil and water conservation profit and loss analysis for development and construction projects[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2008(1):37.
[8]	张凤荣, 高志云, 张乃贵, 等. 农林开发项目用地现状、问题和管理对策[J].中国土地, 1997(11):16. ZHANG Fengrong, GAO Zhiyun, ZHANG Naigui, et al. Land status, problems and management countermeasures for agricultural and forestry development projects[J]. China Land, 1997(11):16.
[9]	水利部, 中国科学院, 中国工程院. 中国水土流失防治与生态安全:开发建设活动卷[M].北京:科学出版社, 2010:50. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Engineering. China Soil erosion prevention and ecological safety:development and construction activities volume[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2010:50.
[10]	彭冬水, 陈吉虎, 姜德文, 等. 农林开发项目水土保持准入条件[J].中国水土保持科学, 2010, 8(3):121. PENG Dongshui, CHEN Jihu, JIANG Dewen, et al. Permitted requirements of soil and water conservation for agricultural and forestry project[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 8(3):121.
[11]	高景晖, 张宇龙, 祁永新, 等. 关于加强农林开发活动水土保持监督管理的思考[J].中国水土保持, 2012(12):27. GAO Jinghui, ZHANG Yulong, QI Yongxin, et al. Thoughts on strengthening supervision and management of soil and water conservation in agricultural and forestry development activities[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2012(12):27.
[12]	刘海娟, 张婷, 侍昊, 等. 基于RF模型的高分辨率遥感影像分类评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):99. LIU Haijuan, ZHANG Ting, SHI Hao, etal. Classification evaluation on high resolution remote sensing image based on RF[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(1):99.
[13]	田佳榕, 代婷婷, 徐雁南, 等. 基于地基激光雷达的采矿废弃地生态修复的植被参数提取[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(8):686. TIAN Jiarong, DAI Tingting, XU Yannan, et al. Extraction of vegetation parameters in different stages of ecological restoration on abandoned mine area based on T-LiDAR[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(8):686.
[14]	ZHANG Hongda, ZHANG Ronghua, QI Fei, et al. The CSLE model based soil erosion prediction:Comparisons of sampling density and extrapolation method at the county level[J]. Catena, 2018(165):465.
[15]	王儒密. CSLE模型在土地整治项目土壤侵蚀定量评价中的应用分析[J].农技服务, 2017, 34(6):12. WANG Rumi. Application analysis of CSLE model in quantitative evaluation of soil erosion in land remediation project[J]. Agricultural Technology Services, 2017, 34(6):12.
[16]	杨韶洋, 刘霞, 姚孝友, 等. 沂蒙山区降雨侵蚀力空间分布推算方法[J].中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(2):1. YANG Shaoyang, LIU Xia, YAO Xiaoyou, etal. Calculation methods of rainfall erosivity spatial distribution in Yimeng Mountain Area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 13(2):1.
[17]	章文波, 谢云, 刘宝元. 利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学, 2002,22(6):705. ZHANG Wenbo, XIE Yun, LIU Baoyuan. Rainfall erosivity estimation using daily rainfall amounts[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 22(6):705.
[18]	李军. 基于日降雨数据的辽宁省降雨侵蚀力初步分析[J].水土保持应用技术, 2018(3):8. LI Jun. Analysis of rainfall erosivity based on daily rainfall amounts in Liaoning province[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018(3):8.
[19]	胡刚, 宋慧, 刘宝元, 等. 黑土区基准坡长和LS算法对地形因子的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(3):166. HU Gang, SONG Hui, LIU Baoyuan, etal. Effects of both slope length of standard plot and algorithms of LS on calculated values of topography factor (LS) in black soil areas in Northeast China[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(3):166.