|
|
Advances in evaluation methods of soil and water conservation benefits in China |
PAN Xi1, LUO Wei2, DUAN Xingwu1, ZHONG Ronghua1, LI Yuxiang1 |
1. Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-security, Yunnan University, 650091, Kunming, China; 2. Sichuan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 610041, Chengdu, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] China is among the countries that suffer most serious soil erosion in the world. During the process of soil erosion control, various methods were developed to evaluate the benefits of soil and water conservation measures. However, it is difficult to select a method from so many for specific context due to lack of a systemic summary of the evaluation methods to clarify and compare the advantages and scope of application of existing methods.[Methods] Based on literature survey, we summarized the characteristics, strengths and weaknesses and scope of application of the existing evaluation methods. The information of the methods was collected from 33 core papers out of 892 papers published in Chinese in the past 20 years with the keywords of "soil and water conservation" and "benefits evaluation".[Results] Eleven methods were widely used to evaluate the benefits of soil and water conservation at present, including empirical evaluation method, BP artificial neural network method, genetic algorithm, double-set assessment indexes system method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, grey correlation analysis method,TOPSIS method, ontology knowledge base method, matter-element extension model, weighted summation formula method, and comprehensive evaluation methods. There are different scopes of application for different methods according to their characteristics, advantages and limitations. Weighted summation method is mainly suitable for evaluation in large-scale region or watershed as it has no requirements on the number of indicators and takes the relationships among the indicators into consideration. Genetic algorithm and TOPSIS method are more suitable for comparison of benefits among different soil and water conservation measures and measures selection; because these two methods could be used to calculate the optimal solution for the benefits obtained from different soil and water conservation measures. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and grey correlation analysis are suitable for areas with complex environments where data are scarce or difficult to acquire, which had lower requirements for data and could generate more objective evaluation results.[Conclusions] In the future, researches should be focused on the exploration and application of new methods by combining computer technology and artificial intelligence, integrating theories with multiple methods, and modeling, etc. In order to improve the benefits of soil and water conservation projects, the application of evaluation methods should be selected according to local physical and socio-economic conditions with long-term monitoring and timely adjustment. Besides, relevant departments should draft general criteria for benefits evaluation of soil and water conservation, which could be used among different soil erosion prevention areas across the country to facilitate comparison among different areas, and promote the performance of soil and water conservation projects in China.
|
Received: 01 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
胡世明,陈瑾. 中国水土流失防治机制的构建与发展[J]. 水利经济,2017,35(5):1. HU Shiming,CHEN Jin. Establishment and development of prevention and control mechanism of water loss and soil erosion in China[J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources,2017,35(5):1.
|
[2] |
中华人民共和国水利部. 第一次全国水利普查水土保持情况公报[J]. 中国水土保持,2013(10):2. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Bulletin of first national water census for soil and water conservation[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,2013(10):2.
|
[3] |
ZHANG Guanghua,LIU Guobin,WANG Guoliang,et al. Effects of vegetation cover and rainfall intensity on sediment-bound nutrient loss,size composition and volume fractal dimension of sediment particles[J]. Pedosphere,2011,21(5):676.
|
[4] |
徐世晓,赵新全,孙平,等.水土流失及其影响分析[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(5):31. XU Shixiao,ZHAO Xinquan,SUN Ping,et al. Review of soil and water loss and its impact[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,16(5):31.
|
[5] |
陈奇伯,王克勤,齐实,等.黄土丘陵区坡耕地水土流失与土地生产力的关系[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1463. CHEN Qibo,WANG Keqin,QI Shi,et al. Soil and water erosion in its relation to slope field productivity in hilly gully areas of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2003,23(8):1463.
|
[6] |
PIMENTEL D,KOUNANG N. Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems[J]. Ecosystems,1998,1(5):416.
|
[7] |
王泽元,康玲玲,杨洲, 等. 水土保持效益分析与评价浅析[J]. 水土保持,2016,4(1):1. WANG Zeyuan,KANG Lingling,YANG Zhou,et al. Analysis and evaluation of soil and water conservation benefit[J]. Open Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,4(1):1.
|
[8] |
陈渠昌,张如生. 水土保持综合效益定量分析方法及指标体系研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2007,5(2):95. CHEN Quchang,ZHANG Rusheng. Study on approaches and index system for quantitatively analyzing comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,2007,5(2):95.
|
[9] |
李锐. 黄土高原区域治理与评价[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1992:347. LI Rui. The regional governance and evaluation of Loess Plateau[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1992:347.
|
[10] |
李智广,李锐,杨勤科,等. 小流域治理综合效益评价指标体系研究[J]. 水土保持通报,1998,18(7):71. LI Zhiguang,LI Rui,YANG Qinke,et al. Indictor system for comprehensive benefit evaluation of small watershed management[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,18(7):71.
|
[11] |
刘宝元,刘瑛娜,张科利,等. 中国水土保持措施分类[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(2):80. LIU Baoyuan,LIU Yingna,ZHANG Keli,et al. Classification for soil conservation practices in China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(2):80.
|
[12] |
王琦,杨勤科. 区域水土保持效益评价指标体系及评价方法研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2010,17(2):32. WANG Qi,YANG Qinke. Parameters and methods for benefit evaluation of region-scale soil and water conservation[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(2):32.
|
[13] |
高照良,田红卫,王冬,等. 水土保持工程措施生态服务功能的物质量化分析[J]. 生态经济,2012(11):149. GAO Zhaoliang,TIAN Hongwei,WANG Dong,et al. Soil and water conservation ecological service function engineering measures things quality calculation[J]. Ecological Economy,2012(11):149.
|
[14] |
王禹生,田红. 铁瓦河小流域水土保持经济效益计算[J]. 人民长江,1999,30(4):27. WANG Yusheng,TIAN Hong. Economic benefit calculation for soil-water conservation project of small Tiewa river basin[J]. Yangtze River,1999,30(4):27.
|
[15] |
王昌高,吴卿,史学建,等. 水土保持生态工程经济评价中几个问题的探讨[J]. 水土保持通报,2003,23(4):78. WANG Changgao, WU Qing, SHI Xuejian,et al. The discussion of some problems on economic evaluation of water and soil conservation projections[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,23(4):78.
|
[16] |
李恩慧. 玉田县团城小流域治理措施及效益分析[J]. 水科学与工程技术,2005(增刊1):57. LI Enhui. Measures and efficiency analysis of Tuancheng small watershed in Yutian county[J]. Water Sciences and Engineering Technology,2005(s1):57.
|
[17] |
韦杰,贺秀斌,汪涌,等.基于DPSIR概念框架的区域水土保持效益评价新思路[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(4):66. WEI Jie,HE Xiubin,WANG Yong,et al. Assessing benefits of soil and water conservation based on the DPSIR conceptual framework[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,5(4):66.
|
[18] |
刘彬彬,邸利,马晓燕,等. 定西市安定区不同水土保持措施结构下综合效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究,2014,21(3):152. LIU Binbin,DI Li,MA Xiaoyan,et al. Research of comprehensive benefits under different structures of soil and water conservation measures in Anding district of Dingxi city[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(3):152.
|
[19] |
廖炜,杨芬,吴宜进,等. 基于物元可拓模型的水土保持综合效益评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(10):1464. LIAO Wei,YANG Fen,WU Yijin,et al. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of soil and water conservation based on Matter-element Extension model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2014,23(10):1464.
|
[20] |
吴高伟,王瑄. 遗传算法在水土保持综合效益评价中的应用初探[J]. 水土保持研究,2008,15(3):223. WU Gaowei,WANG Xuan. Elementary application of genetic algorithms to the comprehensive benefit evaluation about soil and water conservation[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(3):223.
|
[21] |
徐伟铭,陆在宝,肖桂荣. 基于遗传算法的水土保持措施空间优化配置[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):114. XU Weiming,LU Zaibao,XIAO Guirong. Optimization of spatial allocation for soil and water conservation measures based on genetic algorithm[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,14(6):114.
|
[22] |
李梦辰. 基于BP神经网络的水土保持综合效益评价:南之沟小流域应用分析[D]. 西安:西安理工大学,2013. LI Mengchen. The comprehensive benefit evaluation of soil and water conservation on BP artifical neural network[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Technology,2013.
|
[23] |
楼文高. 基于BP网络的水土保持可持续发展评价模型[J]. 人民黄河,2007,29(8):52. LOU Wengao. BP network-based sustainable development evaluation model of soil and water conservation[J]. Yellow River,2007,29(8):52.
|
[24] |
陈衍泰,陈国宏,李美娟. 综合评价方法分类及研究进展[J]. 管理科学学报,2004,7(2):69. CHEN Yantai,CHEN Guohong,LI Meijuan. Classification & research advancement of comprehensive evaluation methods[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2004,7(2):69.
|
[25] |
刘刚才,张建辉,杜树汉,等. 关于水土保持措施适宜性的评价方法[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):108. LIU Gangcai,ZHANG Jianhui,DU Shuhan,et al. On the suitability assessment of soil and water conservation measures[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,7(1):108.
|
[26] |
代富强,刘刚才. 紫色土丘陵区典型水土保持措施的适宜性评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2011,9(4):23. DAI Fuqiang,LIU Gangcai. Suitability evaluation of typical soil and water conservation measures in hilly areas of purple soil[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,9(4):23.
|
[27] |
任烨,张丰. 中沟流域水土保持综合治理经济分析与效益评价[J]. 中国水土保持,1995(5):24. REN Ye,ZHANG Feng. Econolny analysis and benefit analysis of soil and water conservation comprehensive manage-ment in Zhonggou watershed[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,1995(5):24.
|
[28] |
张龙,汤崇军,郑海金. 鄱阳湖流域水土保持重点治理一期工程效益后评价研究[J]. 中国水土保持,2013(9):61. ZHANG Long,TANG Chongjun,ZHENG Haijin. Post-evaluation study on benefits of the first phase project of key soil and water conservation control in Poyang lake basin[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,2013(9):61.
|
[29] |
刘刚才,李兰,周忠浩,等. 紫色土丘陵区坡耕地退耕对水土流失的影响及其效益评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2005,3(4):32. LIU Gangcai,LI Lan,ZHOU Zhonghao,et al. Influence and its benefits evaluation of removal lands from cultivation to afforestation and grassland in slope farmland on soil erosion in hilly region of purple soil[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,3(4):32.
|
[30] |
邓欧,尹忠东,冯仲科,等. 四川省长江上游水土保持工程生态经济综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2010,26(5):88. DENG Ou,YIN Zhongdong,FENG Zhongke,et al. Comprehensive evaluation for ecological economy of soil and water conservation engineering in upper Yangtze River in Sichuan Province[J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2010,26(5):88.
|
[31] |
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 土保持综合治理效益计算方法:GB/T 15774-2008[S]. 中国标准出版社,2009. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Comprehensive control of soil and water conservation-Method of benefit calculation:GB/T 15774-2008[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2009.
|
[32] |
杨扬,刘雨鑫,金平伟,等. 坡面水土保持措施效益评价:以贵州省冗雷河小流域为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):64. YANG Yang,LIU Yuxin,JIN Pingwei,et al. Benefit evaluation on soil and water conservation practices:A case study on Rongleihe watershed in Guizhou province[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,13(5):64.
|
[33] |
李宗杰,宋玲玲,田青,等. 甘肃省长江流域水土保持综合治理效益分析[J]. 水土保持通报,2016,36(4):244. LI Zongjie,SONG Lingling,TIAN Qing, et al. Benefits evaluation of soil and water conservation comprehensive harness of Yangtze River basin in Gansu province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,36(4):244.
|
[34] |
温钦舒. 大型丛生竹水土保持效益试验初探[J]. 亚热带水土保持,2006,18(3):19. WEN Qinshu. Initial discuss on the soil conservation benefit of large scale Caespitose bamboo[J]. Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation,2006,18(3):19.
|
[35] |
胡明. 安塞县水土保持综合效益评价分析[J]. 中国水利,2012,18:45. HU Ming. Evaluation and analysis of comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation in Ansai county[J]. China Water Resources,2012,18:45.
|
[36] |
郑国权,温美丽,杨宪杰,等. 广东省小流域综合治理效益评价指标体系的理论构建[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2016(7):86. ZHENG Guoquan,WEN Meili,YANG Xianjie,et al. Theoretical construction of indicator system of benefit assessment for comprehensive management in small watersheds of Guangdong province[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower,2016(7):86.
|
[37] |
钟原,陈菊红,马安妮,等. 南水北调陕西水源区水土保持效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究,2016,23(3):119. ZHONG Yuan,CHEN Juhong,MA Anni,et al. Evaluation of benefit of soil and water conservation in water source area of the South-to-north Water Diversion Project in Shanxi province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(3):119.
|
[38] |
胡续礼,张光灿,徐志强,等. 桐柏大别山区水土保持生态修复适宜性评价与分区[J]. 水土保持通报,2014,34(5):258. HU Xuli,ZHANG Guangcan,XU Zhiqiang,et al. Suitability evaluation and zoning in ecological restoration of soil and water conservation in Tongbai-Dabie mountains area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,34(5):258.
|
[39] |
焦金鱼,贵立德,何启明,等. 基于突变级数法的半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域水土保持综合效益研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报,2011,39(1):171. JIAO Jinyu,GUI Lide,HE Qiming,et al. Study on comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation of small watershed in semi-arid loess hilly region based on catastrophe progression method[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition),2011,39(1):171.
|
[40] |
胡晓静,齐实,朱国平. 流域水土保持可持续发展评价研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2003,17(1):23. HU Xiaojing,QI Shi,ZHU Guoping. Sustainable development evaluation on water and soil conservation of watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,17(1):23.
|
[41] |
陈海滨,陈志彪. 侵蚀红壤小流域水土保持措施的土壤肥力效应评价:以朱溪小流域为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2011,18(5):81. CHEN Haibin,CHEN Zhibiao. Assessment of soil fertility under soil and water conservation measures in red eroded soil watershed:A case study in the small watershed of Zhuxi[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(5):81.
|
[42] |
王宏兴,王晓,杨秀英,等. 多目标决策灰色关联投影法在小流域水土保持生态工程综合效益评价中的应用[J]. 水土保持研究,2003,10(4):43. WANG Hongxing,WANG Xiao,YANG Xiuying,et al. Application of multi-criteria decision grey relation projection method to synthetic benefit evaluation of soil and water conservation ecological project in small watershed[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(4):43.
|
[43] |
吴高伟,王瑄,王玉民,等.丹东市水土保持综合效益评价模型的建立与解析[J].中国水土保持,2008(6):33. WU Gaowei,WANG Xuan,WANG Yumin,et al. Model development and analyzed of benefits evaluation of soil and water conservation in Dandong[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,2008(6):33.
|
[44] |
吕峰,崔晓辉. 多目标决策灰色关联投影法及其应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(1):103. LV Feng,CUI Xiaohui. Multi-criteria decision grey relation projection method and its application[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice,2002,22(1):103.
|
[45] |
尤立,刘平,张俊龙,等. 基于熵权的改进TOPSIS方法对黄河水土保持生态工程综合效益评估[J]. 安徽农业科学,2017,45(5):232. YOU Li,LIU Ping,ZHANG Junlong,et al. Evaluation of social and economic benefits of soil and water conservation project of Yellow River through entropy-weight TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(5):232.
|
[46] |
姚应龙,徐伟铭,涂平. 面向水土保持措施适宜性评价的本体知识库构建[J]. 福州大学学报,2016,44(2):188. YAO Yinglong,XU Weiming,TU Ping. Construction of ontology knowledge base for water-and-soil conservation measures suitability evaluation[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University(Natural Science Edition),2016,44(2):188.
|
[47] |
石蓝星,唐德善,孟颖,等. 基于改进物元可拓模型的城市洪灾风险评价[J]. 人民黄河,2017(7):71. SHI Lanxing,TANG Deshan,MENG Ying,et al. Evaluation of urban flood damage risks based on improved Matter-element extension model[J].Yellow River,2017(7):71.
|
[48] |
解刚,薛凤,王向东,等. 水电项目水土保持生态效应评价研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2018,49(1):167. XIE Gang,XUE Feng,WANG Xiangdong,et al. Study on evaluation of ecological effect from soil and water conservation of hydropower project[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2018,49(1):167.
|
|
|
|