Review of wastewater treatment technologies, soil and water conservation measures in nuclear power plants, and inspirations to Fukushima accident
WANG Chu1,2, NIU Jianzhi1,3,4,5, LUN Xiaoxiu6, ZHANG Linus7, BERNDTSSON Ronny7
1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, Australia; 3. State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, 100083, Beijing, China; 4. Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, 100083, Beijing, China; 5. Engineering Research Center of Forestry Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 6. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 7. Division of Water Resources Engineering & Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund University, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
Abstract：[Background] The previous studies suggest that radioactive elements like Cs and Sr may adversely affect marine ecosystems and the fishing industry. Traditional treatment systems for radioactive wastewater like the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) and Kurion have faced challenges in limiting concentration and achieving safety criteria. Studies suggest potential long-term impacts on benthic organisms and seafood networks due to radioactive elements like Cs and Sr from the discharged radioactive wastewater, which may hinder post-disaster recovery and provoke economic losses in the fishing industry both domestically and internationally. A series of studies indicate that there are issues of Cs and Sr pollution migration in soil and water conservation in Fukushima. [Methods] To provide feasible solutions, the main article includes five nuclear wastewater treatment technologies, and soil and water conservation measures for different media (water and soil) were evaluated through reviewing the previous fifteen years' articles. To provide feasible solutions, the main articles, the phytoextraction technologies in Cs and Sr treatment within different land use areas were wildly analyzed (Camellia japonica, Arabidopsis halleri and other local species). [Results] 1) A 99.9% removal rate for Cs+ and 99.5% for Sr2+ was achieved by the KFe[Fe(CN)6] and BaSO4 co-precipitation method. 2) For membrane filtration, Sr2+ and Cs+were removed using metal-organic framework (MOF/graphene oxide) and ion exchange techniques using inorganic materials like titanosilicates. The absorption efficiency of membrane filtration for Sr2+ and Cs+ was at least 92% and 94%, respectively. The study analyzed soil and water conservation technologies in different land uses, river basins and catchments.3) The underground water treatment mainly were completed via the membrance technologies like reverse osmosis and Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB) technologies. The 90Sr concentration decreased 77%-91% compared to the initial concentration by PRB technology.These diverse methods offered effective strategies for radioactive wastewater treatment, especially the co-precipitation method may be feasible remediation measures to ensure ecological safety surrounding nuclear power utilizing areas. Soil and water conservation measures for soil pollution treatment mainly focused on the use of stabilizers to hinder the migration of Cs and Sr in the soil and the effects of wind erosion such as interpolyelectrolyte complexes. [Conclusions] We evaluated the pollution of Cs and Sr in the Fukushima nuclear radiation soil and water to provide solutions for the treatment of nuclear wastewater and to prevent radionuclide pollutants from migrating into the soil and water.
PRǍVǍLIE R, BANDOC G. Nuclear energy: Between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018(209): 81.
[2]
FAWCETT A A, IYER G C, CLARKE L E, et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?[J]. Science, 2015, 350(6265): 1168.
[3]
WEALER B, BAUER S, HIRSCHHAUSEN C V, et al. Investing into third generation nuclear power plants: Review of recent trends and analysis of future investments using monte carlosimulation[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 143: 110836.
[4]
ZHAN Liu, BO Yang, LIN Tian, et al. Development and outlook of advanced nuclear energy technology[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2021, 34: 100630.
[5]
World Nuclear Association. World nuclear performance report 2023[R/OL]. (2023-09-11)[2024-05-25].https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-power-in-the-world-today.aspx.
[6]
Our World in Data. United States: Energy country profile[R/OL]. (2023-09-21)[2024-05-24]. https://ourworldindata.org/energy/country/united-states#what-sources-does-the-country-get-its-energy-from.
[7]
Our World in Data. CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions[R/OL]. (2023-09-21)[2024-05-24].https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
[8]
FESENKO S. Review of radiation effects in non-human species in areas affected by the Kyshtym accident[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2019, 39(1): R1.
[9]
KRYSHEV I I, ROMANOV G N, ISAEVA L N, et al. Radioecological state of lakes in the southern Ural impacted by radioactivity release of the 1957 radiation accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 1997, 34(3): 223.
[10]
SHISHKINA E A, STARICHENKO V I, VALEEVA E R, et al. Assessment of herb field mouse (Sylvaemus uralensis) migration in the area of the East Urals Radioactive trace using measurements of bone-seeking 90Sr[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2021(234): 106628.
[11]
KARAVAEVA Y N, KULIKOV N V, MOLCHANOVA I V, et al. Accumulation and distribution of long-living radionuclides in the forest ecosystems of the Kyshtym accident zone[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1994(157): 147.
[12]
POZOLOTINA V N, MOLCHANOVA I V, KARAVAEVA E N, et al. Radionuclides in terrestrial ecosystems of the zone of Kyshtym accident in the Urals[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2010, 101(6): 438.
[13]
FREED R, SMITH L, BUGAI D. The effective source area of 90Sr for a stream near Chernobyl, Ukraine[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2004, 71(1/4): 1.
[14]
TEIEN H C, KASHPAROVA O, SALBU B, et al. Seasonal changes in uptake and depuration of 137Cs and 90Sr in silver Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) and common rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786: 147280.
[15]
POVINEC P P, AOYAMA M, BIDDULPHP D, et al. Cesium, iodine and tritium in NW Pacific waters: A comparison of the Fukushima impact with global fallout[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(8): 5481.
[16]
YABLOKOV A V, NESTERENKO V B, NESTERENKO A V. Chapter III. Consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe for the environment[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009, 1181(1): 221.
[17]
RYABOKON N I, SMOLICH I I, KUDRYASHOV V P et al. Long-term development of the radionuclide exposure of murine rodent populations in Belarus after the Chernobyl accident[J]. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2005(44): 169.
[18]
CASTRILLEJO M, CASACUBERTA N, BREIER C F, et al. Reassessment of 90Sr, 137Cs, and 134Cs in the coast off Japan derived from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016(50): 173.
[19]
POVINEC P P, HIROSE K, AOYAMA M.Radiostrontium in the western North Pacific: Characteristics, behavior, and the Fukushima impact[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(18): 10356.
[20]
BEHRENS E, SCHWARZKOPF F U, LVBBECKE J F, et al. Model simulations on the long-term dispersal of 137Cs released into the Pacific Ocean off Fukushima[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2012, 7(3): 034004.
[21]
MADERICH V, JUNG K T, BEZHENAR R, et al. Dispersion and fate of 90Sr in the Northwestern Pacific and adjacent seas: Global fallout and the Fukushima Daiichi accident[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014(494): 261.
[22]
WELLER A, HORI M, SHOZUGAWA K, et al. Rapid ultra-trace determination of Fukushima-derived radionuclides in food[J]. Food Control, 2018(85): 376.
[23]
HATCH M, CARDIS E. Somatic health effects of Chernobyl: 30 years on[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2017(32): 1047
[24]
GAUNTT R O, KALINICH D A, CARDONI J N, et al. Fukushima Daiichi accident study: Status as of April 2012(No. SAND2012-6173)[R]. Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore: Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), 2012,:3. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc841123/m2/1/high_res_d/1055601.pdf
[25]
TIKHOMIROV F A, SHCHEGLOV A I. Main investigation results on the forest radioecology in the Kyshtym and Chernobyl accident zones[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1994, 157: 45.
[26]
AARKROG A, DAHLGAARD H, NIELSEN S P, et al. Radioactive inventories from the Kyshtymand Karachay accidents: Estimates based on soil samples collected in the South Urals (1990-1995)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1997, 201(2): 137.
[27]
ROMANOV G N, NIKIPELOV B V, DROZHKO E G. The Kyshtym accident: Causes, scale and radiation characteristics[R/OL]. (1990-10-1)[2024-05-24].https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:25008504.
[28]
AKLEYEV A V, KRESTININA L Y, DEGTEVA M O, et al. Consequences of the radiation accident at the Mayak production association in 1957(the’Kyshtym Accident’)[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2017, 37(3): R19.
[29]
KASHPAROV V A, LUNDIN S M, KHOMUTININ Y V, et al. Soil contamination with 90Sr in the near zone of the Chernobyl accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2001, 56(3): 285.
[30]
KOROBOVA E, ERMAKOV A, LINNIK V. 137Cs and 90Sr mobility in soils and transfer in soil-plant systems in the Novozybkov district affected by the Chernobyl accident[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1998, 13(7): 803.
[31]
PETROVIĆ J, Č UJIĆ M, DORDEVIĆ M, et al. Spatial distribution and vertical migration of 137 Cs in soils of Belgrade (Serbia) 25 years after the Chernobyl accident[J]. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2013, 15(6): 1279.
[32]
LABUNSKA I, LEVCHUK S, KASHPAROV V, et al. Current radiological situation in areas of Ukraine contaminated by the Chornobyl accident: Part 2. Strontium-90 transfer to culinary grains and forest woods from soils of Ivankiv district[J]. Environment International, 2021(146): 106282.
[33]
LABUNSKA I, KASHPAROV V, LEVCHUK S, et al. Current radiological situation in areas of Ukraine contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: Part 1. Human dietary exposure to Caesium-137 and possible mitigation measures[J]. Environment International, 2018, 117: 250.
[34]
KASHIWAYA K, MUTO Y, KUBO T, et al. Spatial variations of tritium concentrations in groundwater collected in the southern coastal region of Fukushima, Japan, after the nuclear accident[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 12578.
[35]
AOYAMA M, KAJINO M, TANAKA T Y, et al. 134Cs and 137Cs in the North Pacific Ocean derived from the March 2011 TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, Japan. Part two: Estimation of 134Cs and 137Cs inventories in the North Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Oceanography, 2016, 72: 67.
[36]
POVINEC P P, HIROSE K, AOYAMA M. Radiostrontium in the western North Pacific: Characteristics, behavior, and the Fukushima impact[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(18): 10356.
[37]
BUESSELER K, AOYAMA M, FUKASAWA M. Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity[J]. Environmental Science &Technology, 2011, 45(23): 9931.
[38]
KAIZER J, KONTU AL' I, POVINEC P P. Impact of the Fukushima accident on 3H and 14C environmental levels: A review of ten years of investigation[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(6): 2548.
[39]
HAMADA N, OGINO H. Food safety regulations: what we learned from the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Journal of environmental radioactivity, 2012, 111: 83.
[40]
CASACUBERTA N, MASQUÉ P, GARCIA-ORELLANA J, et al. 90Sr and 89Sr in seawater off Japan as a consequence of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(6): 3649.
[41]
DU BOIS P B, LAGUIONIE P, BOUST D, et al. Estimation of marine source-term following Fukushima Daiichi accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2012, (114): 2.
[42]
POVINEC P P, AOYAMA M, BIDDULPH D, et al. Cesium, iodine and tritium in NW Pacific waters-a comparison of the Fukushima impact with global fallout[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(8): 5481.
[43]
TSUMUNE D, TSUBONO T, AOYAMA M, et al. Distribution of oceanic 137Cs from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant simulated numerically by a regional ocean model[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2012, 111: 100.
[44]
YANG Baolu, ONDA Y, WAKIYAMA Y, et al. Temporal changes of radiocesium in irrigated paddy fields and its accumulation in rice plants in Fukushima[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 208: 562.
[45]
KINTSU H, KODAMA K, HORIGUCHI T. Spatial distributions of and species differences in 90Sr accumulation in marine fishes from the Fukushima coastal region[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2023, 256: 107055.
[46]
TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings).Nuclide analysis results of fish and shellfish (the ocean area within 20 km radius of Fukushima Daiichi NPS)[EB/OL].(2012-10-16)[2024-05-24].https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/images/handouts_121016_01-e.pdf.
[47]
KADADOU D, SAID E A, AJAJ R, et al. Research advances in nuclear wastewater treatment using conventional and hybrid technologies: Towards sustainable wastewater reuse and recovery[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2023, 52: 103604.
[48]
GUPTA N K, SENGUPTA A, GUPTA A, et al. Biosorption-an alternative method for nuclear waste management: A critical review[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 2159.
[49]
WANG Jianlong, WAN Zhong. Treatment and disposal of spent radioactive ion-exchange resins produced in the nuclear industry[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2015, 78: 47.
[50]
ONDA Y, TANIGUCHI K, YOSHIMURA K, et al. Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in terrestrial systems[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(12): 644.
[51]
ONDA Y, TANIGUCHI K, YOSHIMURA K et al. Renewed soil erosion and remobilisation of radioactive sediment in Fukushima coastal rivers after the 2013 typhoons[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 4574.
[52]
LACEBY J P, CHARTIN C, EVRARD O, et al. Rainfall erosivity in catchments contaminated with fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 20(6): 2467.
[53]
WEI Lezhang, KINOUCHI T, VELLEUX M L, et al. Soil erosion and transport simulation and critical erosion area identification in a headwater catchment contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 2017, 17: 18.
[54]
NOGRADY B. Is Fukushima wastewater release safe? What the science says[J]. Nature, 2023, 618(7967): 894.
[55]
BUESSELER K O. Opening the floodgates at Fukushima[J]. Science, 2020, 369(6504): 621.
[56]
EVANGELIOU N, BALKANSKI Y, COZIC A, et al. Global transport and deposition of 137Cs following the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in Japan: Emphasis on Europe and Asia using high-resolution model versions and radiological impact assessment of the human population and the environment using interactive tools[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(11): 5803.
[57]
KAWAMURA H, KOBAYASHI T, FURUNO A, et al. Preliminary numerical experiments on oceanic dispersion of 131I and 137Cs discharged into the ocean because of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2011, 48(11): 1349.
[58]
PERIÁÑEZ R, SUH K S, BYUNG-IL M, et al. Numerical modeling of the releases of 90Sr from Fukushima to the ocean: an evaluation of the source term[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(21): 12305.
[59]
BUESSELER K O, JAYNE S R, FISHER N S, et al. Fukushima-derived radionuclides in the ocean and biota off Japan[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(16): 5984.
[60]
LEHTO J, KOIVULA R, LEINONEN H, et al. Removal of radionuclides from Fukushima Daiichi waste effluents[J]. Separation & Purification Reviews, 2019, 48(2): 122.
[61]
HUANG Lanlan. GT exclusive: Detailed evidence exposes Japan's lies, loopholes in nuclear-contaminated wastewater dumping plan-recipe for disaster[N/OL]. Global Times, (2023-06-05)[2024-05-24].https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202306/1291969.shtml
[62]
World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda[R/OL].(2022-03-21)[2024-05-24].https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045064.
[63]
YAMAGUCHI M, IAEA officials say Fukushima's ongoing release of treated radioactive wastewater is going well[N/OL]. PBS NEWS, 2023-10-23[2024-05-24].https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/iaea-officials-say-fukushimas-ongoing-release-of-treated-radioactive-wastewater-is-going-well.
[64]
TEPCO. Radiation concentration estimates for each tank area (as of September 30, 2023)[R].Tokyo: Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc., 2023.
[65]
GUO Ji, LIU Yanmin, WU Xianhua, et al. Assessment of the impact of Fukushima nuclear wastewater discharge on the global economy based on GTAP[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 228: 106296.
[66]
WU Xianhua, ZHANG Yi, FENG Xuehao. The impact of Japanese nuclear wastewater discharge into the sea on the global economy: Input-output model approach[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2023, 192: 115067.
[67]
HANDE V, ORITA M, MATSUNAGA H, et al. Thoughts, perceptions and concerns of coastal residents regarding the discharge of tritium-containing treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean[J]. BMC Public Health, 2023, 23(1): 2436.
[68]
SMITH J, MARKS N, IRWIN T. The risks of radioactive wastewater release[J]. Science, 2023, 382(6666): 31.
[69]
BENDRISS H, CHAKIR E L M, EL BAKKALI J, et al. InterDosi Monte Carlo study of radiation exposure of a reference crab phantom due to radioactive wastewater deposited in marine environment following the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2022, 61(4): 623.
[70]
BATLLE V I J. The potential impact of marine discharges from Fukushima 10 years after the accident[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2022, 18(6): 1530.
[71]
LU Yonglong, YUAN Jingjing, DU Di, et al. Monitoring long-term ecological impacts from release of Fukushima radiation water into ocean[J]. Geography and Sustainability, 2021, 2(2): 95.
[72]
CHEGROUCHE S, MELLAH A, BARKAT M. Removal of strontium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon: kinetic and thermodynamic studies[J]. Desalination, 2009, 235(1/3): 306.
[73]
WU F C, TSENG R L. High adsorption capacity NaOH-activated carbon for dye removal from aqueous solution[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152(3): 1256.
[74]
RAE I B, PAP S, SVOBODOVA D, et al. Comparison of sustainable biosorbents and ion-exchange resins to remove Sr2+ from simulant nuclear wastewater: Batch, dynamic and mechanism studies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 2411.
[75]
KU Young, JUNG Inliang. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide[J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(1): 135.
[76]
WEI Hua, GAO Boqiang, REN Jie, et al. Coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of sludge: A review[J]. Water Research, 2018, 143: 608.
[77]
KIM Y K, KIM S, KIM Y, et al. Facile one-pot synthesis of dual-cation incorporated titanosilicate and its deposition to membrane surfaces for simultaneous removal of Cs+ and Sr2+[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 493: 165.
[78]
ZHAO Yiming, CHENG Lin, WANG Kaiyao, et al. pH-controlled switch over coadsorption and separation for mixed Cs+ and Sr2+ by an acid-resistant potassium thioantimonate[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(21): 2112717.
[79]
OH M, LEE K, JEON M K, et al. Chemical precipitation-based treatment of acidic wastewater generated by chemical decontamination of radioactive concrete[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023, 11(5): 110306.
[80]
HODKIN D J, STEWART D I, GRAHAM J T, et al. Coprecipitation of 14C and Sr with carbonate precipitates: The importance of reaction kinetics and recrystallization pathways[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, (562): 335.
[81]
SHEN Zhiliang, YAN Guihua, CHEN Gaofeng, et al. Preparation and strontium adsorption behaviors of a new sodium manganese silicate material[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, (290): 120824.
[82]
WANG Xuemei, SHAN Tifeng, PANG Shaojun. Phytoremediation potential of Saccharina japonica and Sargassum horneri (Phaeophyceae): Biosorption study of strontium[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2018, 101: 501.
[83]
SEO S D, TRUONG-LAM H S, JEON C, et al. Simultaneous removal of multi-nuclide (Sr2+, Co2+, Cs+, and I-) from aquatic environments using a hydrate-based water purification process[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 462: 132700.
[84]
BENGIAT R, BOGOSLAVSKY B, MANDLER D, et al. Selective binding and precipitation of cesium ions from aqueous solutions: A size-driven supramolecular reaction[J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2018, 24(13): 3161.
[85]
TOKUNAGA K, KOZAI N, TAKAHASHI Y.A new technique for removing strontium from seawater by coprecipitation with barite[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 359: 307.
[86]
WU Liya, ZHANG Guanghui, WANG Quanzhen, et al. Removal of strontium from liquid waste using a hydraulic pellet co-precipitation microfiltration (HPC-MF) process[J]. Desalination, 2014, 349: 31.
[87]
SINHA P K, LAL K B, AHMED J. Removal of radioiodine from liquid effluents[J]. Waste Management, 1997, 17(1): 33.
[88]
KRUK M, JARONIEC M, SAYARI A.Adsorption study of surface and structural properties of MCM-41 materials of different pore sizes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1997, 101(4): 583.
[89]
XIA Xu, SHEN Juan, CAO Fang, et al. A facile synthesis of hydroxyapatite for effective removal strontium ion[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 368: 326.
[90]
EJAZ S Z H, IQBAL S, SHAHIDA S, et al. Development of titanium doped hydroxyapatite for efficient removal of radioactive strontium from contaminated water[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2023, 47(1): 443.
[91]
LI Hu, HAN Kexue, SHANG Jinhua, et al. Comparison of adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of strontium by six typical adsorption materials[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(13): 7723.
[92]
DELKASH M, BAKHSHAYESH B E, KAZEMIAN H. Using zeolitic adsorbents to cleanup special wastewater streams: A review[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2015, 214: 224.
[93]
SEO S D, TRUONG-LAM H S, JEON C, et al. Simultaneous removal of multi-nuclide (Sr2+, Co2+, Cs+, and I-) from aquatic environments using a hydrate-based water purification process[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 462: 132700.
[94]
FISKUM S K, PEASE L F, PETERSON R A. Review of ion exchange technologies for cesium removal from caustic tank waste[J]. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2020, 38(6): 573.
[95]
ZHANG Lan, WEI Jiying, ZHAO Xuan, et al. Competitive adsorption of strontium and cobalt onto tin antimonate[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285: 679.
[96]
WANG Shuai, LIANG Shanshan. Acid response nanochannels of graphene oxide membranes for fast nuclide ions separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2024, 328: 125086.
[97]
VISHWAKARMA R K, NARAYANAM P K, UMAMAHESWARI R, et al. Amino-functionalized graphene oxide membranes for efficient separation of Sr2+ ions[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2023, 51: 103329.
[98]
CHENG Junye, LIU Kaili, LI Xin, et al. Nickel-metal-organic framework nanobelt based composite membranes for efficient Sr2+ removal from aqueous solution[J]. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2020, 3: 100035.
[99]
KIM H J, KIM S J, HYEON S, et al. Application of desalination membranes to nuclide (Cs, Sr, and Co) separation[J]. ACS omega, 2020, 5(32): 20261.
2024, Vol. 22 
