依据物质组成分布特征的堰塞坝溃决特征

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023147

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要通过模型试验,考虑堰塞坝内部物质分布特征的不同,探讨均匀混合型堰塞坝(UM)、上粗下细型堰塞坝(TCBF)、叠瓦堆积粗叠细型(PCPF)堰塞坝和叠瓦堆积细叠粗型(PFPC)堰塞坝的溃决特征。结果表明:在坝体材料整体颗粒级配相同的情况下,具有不同内部物质分布特征的堰塞坝溃决过程基本可分为渗流侵蚀阶段、溯源侵蚀阶段、溃口发展阶段及粗化平衡4个阶段,但不同坝体在不同阶段呈现明显的差异性。PCPF型堰塞坝渗流侵蚀历时最短,TCBF型堰塞坝渗流侵蚀阶段最长,后者是前者的2.5倍。UM型和TCBF型堰塞坝的溃决过程早于PFPC和PCPF型堰塞坝,UM型堰塞坝溃口下切速率最小,下切过程较匀速;PFPC型堰塞坝在溯源侵蚀阶段形成的侵蚀槽窄而深,在溃口发展初期下切速率最大,可观察到频繁的岸壁崩塌-堵塞溃口-溃决现象;PCPF型堰塞坝在溯源侵蚀阶段形成的侵蚀槽宽而浅,溃口发展阶段后期下切速率最大,下游坡面局部区域易产生滑移。不同堰塞坝条件下溃决洪峰流量放大系数也不同,大小顺序为PCPF

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王小军
	谢湘平
	黄宏鑫
	刘珍珍

关键词 ：滑坡, 堰塞坝, 溃决, 物质组成, 分布特征

Abstract：[Background] Barrier dams, formed by natural forces and accumulated loosely, are highly susceptible to breaching, posing a serious threat to life and property safety. At present, researchers pay more attention to the impact of the overall material composition of landslide barrier dam on the dam breaching and stability, and do not consider the internal distribution characteristics of the materials. Is there any influence of the distribution of material composition on the breaching and stability of landslide barrier dams? [Methods] According to previous studies, four types of landslide barrier dams were established considering the different distribution characteristics of the material, which are uniformly mixed type (UM), top-coarse and bottom-fine type (TCBF), pre-coarse and post-fine dam (PCPF) as well as pre-fine and post-coarse type (PFPC). Through model tests, the whole breaching process was recorded, and the characteristics of the breaching development and the outflow discharge were analyzed. [Results] 1) Different barrier dams shared similar four breaking process, that is, seepage erosion stage, retrograde erosion stage, breach development stage and coarsening equilibrium stage, but obvious characteristics in different stages have been observed for different barrier dams.2) The duration of the seepage erosion stage of the PCPF-type dam is the shortest while the UCBF-type dam is the longest, and the latter is 2.5 times of the former. 3) The overtopping failure process of UM-type dam and TCBF-type dam are earlier than that of PCPF-type dam and PFPC-type dam. The erosion rate of the UM-type dam is the smallest, and the breach development process is relatively uniform.The erosion groove of the PFPC-type dam was narrow and deep developed in the retrograde erosionstage, and local collapses of the slope bank occurred most frequently during the breach development stage, causing the highest erosion rate during the first 10 s of the breach development stage and leading to frequent collapse-clogging-breaking phenomenon. A wide and shallow erosion groove developed during the retrograde erosion stage in the PCPF-type dam. The erosion rate is the largest during the later breach development stage, and the local area of the downstream slope is prone to sliding.4) The amplification coefficients of the outburst-flow peak discharge also vary among different landslide barrier dams, sharing an order of PCPFConclusions] The results demonstrate that the distribution characteristics of the material composition inside a landslide barrier dam have different effects on the breach time, breach process and breach flow discharge of the dam, which should be considered in the stability analysis of landslide barrier dam.

Key words： landslide barrier dam breaching sediment composition distribution characteristics

收稿日期: 2023-10-17

PACS:

P642.23

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年基金“考虑漂木作用的泥石流堰塞坝稳定性实验研究”(41907258)

通讯作者: 谢湘平(1987—),女,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:山地灾害防灾减灾。E-mail:xxp_imde@163.com E-mail: xxp_imde@163.com

作者简介: 王小军(1989—),男,助教,硕士。主要研究方向:山地灾害防灾减灾。E-mail:wxjxxp1314@163.com

引用本文:

王小军, 谢湘平, 黄宏鑫, 刘珍珍. 依据物质组成分布特征的堰塞坝溃决特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2024, 22(5): 189-198.
WANG Xiaojun, XIE Xiangping, HUANG Hongxin, LIU Zhenzhen. Breach characteristics of barrier dams according to the distribution characteristics of material composition. SSWC, 2024, 22(5): 189-198.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023147 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/Y2024/V22/I5/189

[1]	YIN Yueping, WANG F, SUN P. Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China[J]. Landslides,2009, 6(2): 139.
[2]	ZHANG Shaojie, XIE Xiangping, WEI Fangqiang, et al. A seismically triggered landslide dam in Honshiyan, Yunnan, China: From emergency management to hydropower potential[J]. Landslides, 2015, 12(6):1147.
[3]	许强,郑光,李为乐,等. 2018年 10月和11月金沙江白格两次滑坡:堰塞堵江事件分析研究[J].工程地质学报,2018,26(6): 1534. XU Qiang, ZHENG Guang, LI Weile, et al. Analysis of two landslide weir blockage events in Baige of Jinsha River in October and November 2018[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018,26(6): 1534.
[4]	ZHOU Gongdan, CUI Peng, CHEN Huayong, et al. Experimental study on cascading landslide dam failures by upstream flows[J]. Landslides,2013, 10(5):633.
[5]	胡向德,黎志恒,魏洁,等.舟曲县三眼峪沟特大型泥石流的形成和运动特征[J].水文地质工程地质,2011, 38(4): 82. HU Xiangde, LI Zhiheng, WEI Jie, et al. Formation and movementcharacteristics of super large debris flow in Sanyanyugou of Zhouqu county [J]. Hydrogeology Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(4):82.
[6]	覃浩坤,张海泉,张波. 汶川震区震后七盘沟多级堵溃泥石流形成条件分析[J].工程地质学报, 2016,24(S):100. QIN Haokun, ZHANG Haiquan, ZHANG Bo.Formation conditions of the Qipangou multistage dam-breaking debris flow in Wenchuan area after the earthquake[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2016, 24(S):100.
[7]	王道正,陈晓清,罗志刚,等. 不同颗粒级配条件下堰塞坝溃决特征试验研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报, 2016,36(5):827. WANG Daozheng, CHEN Xiaoqing, LUO Zhigang, et al. Experimental research on breaking of barrier lake dam under different grading conditions[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016,36(5):827.
[8]	石振明,张公鼎,彭铭,等.堰塞坝体材料渗透特性及其稳定性研究[J].工程地质学报,2017, 25(5):1182. SHI Zhenming, ZHANG Gongding, PENG Ming, et al. Study on the permeability and stability of landslide dam materials[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(5):1182.
[9]	张健楠,余斌,张惠惠. 堰塞坝溃决特征和机理的试验研究[J].人民黄河,2014,36(10):48. ZHANG Jiannan, YU Bin, ZHANG Huihui. Experimental study on the character and mechanism of dam-break[J]. Yellow River, 2014, 36(10):48.
[10]	钟启明,陈生水,赵联桢,等.堰塞坝漫顶溃决过程数值模拟[J].河海大学学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(4):405. ZHONG Qiming, CHEN Shengshui, ZHAO Lianzhen, et al. Numerical simulation of overtopping failure process of a barrier dam[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2012, 40(4):405.
[11]	赵高文,姜元俊,乔建平,等. 不同密实条件的滑坡堰塞坝漫顶溃决实验[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(6):1496. ZHAO Gaowen, JIANG Yuanjun, QIAO Jianping, et al. Experimental investigation on overtopping failure of landslide dams with different conditions of compactness[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(6):1496.
[12]	王玉峰,程谦恭,朱圻.汶川地震触发高速远程滑坡-碎屑流堆积反粒序特征及机制分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(6):1089. WANG Yufeng, CHEN Qiangong, ZHU Qi. Inverse grading analysis of deposit from rock avalanches triggered by Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012,31(6):1089.
[13]	郑光,许强,彭双麒.滑坡-碎屑流的堆积特征及机理分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2019, 27(4): 842. ZHENG Guang, XU Qiang, PENG Shuangqi. Mechanism analysis of the accumulation characteristics of rock avalanche[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(4): 842.
[14]	石北啸.滑坡型堰塞坝典型特征分析[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2020,3(4):1. SHI Beixiao. Analysis on the typical characteristics of barrier dam [J]. Hydro Science and Cold Zone Engineering, 2020, 3(4):1.
[15]	XIE Xiangping, WANG Xiaojun, ZHAO Shenzhou, et al. Experimental study on the accumulation characteristics and mechanism of landslide debris dam [J]. Frontiers in Earth Science.2022, 10:878782.