情报科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 153-161.

• 业务研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外科学数据治理研究的比较分析

  

  • 出版日期:2024-01-05 发布日期:2024-06-04

  • Online:2024-01-05 Published:2024-06-04

摘要:

【目的/意义】科学数据治理是促进科学数据开放、激发数据价值的有效手段,梳理与总结国内外相关研究,
有助于发掘新的研究点,为科学数据治理研究与实践奠定理论基础。【方法/过程】采用系统性综述方法对科学数据
治理研究进行梳理,全面呈现当前研究现状,并对比国内外研究主题的异同。【结果/结论】研究发现国内外都关注
科学数据治理策略和模型的研究。国内强调图书馆参与的重要性,关注临床科学数据治理平台开发、高校和科研
机构科学数据治理模型构建;国外则聚焦于《通用数据保护条例》对科学数据治理的影响、利益相关者视角的治理
挑战、科学数据治理伦理、生物医学机构的治理模型、治理技术和实践研究。【创新/局限】对比分析了国内外相关研
究,未来可从研究手段、应用领域、体制机制、协同治理等维度提高科学数据治理研究。

Abstract:

【Purpose/significance】 Research data governance is an effective means to promote the openness of research data and stimu⁃
late data value. Combing and summarizing relevant researches at home and abroad is helpful to explore new research points and lay a
theoretical foundation for the research and practice of scientific data governance.【Method/process】 This study adopts a systematic re⁃
view method to sort out research data governance studies, present a comprehensive overview of the current status of the field, and com⁃
pare the similarities and differences between domestic and international research topics.【Result/conclusion】 It is study found that
both domestic and international studies focus on strategies and models of research data governance. Domestic studies emphasize the
importance of library engagement and focus on the development of clinical research data governance platforms and research gover⁃
nance models at universities and institutions. Foreign studies concentrate on the impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on
research data governance, governance challenges from a stakeholder's perspective, research data governance ethics, governance mod⁃
els, techniques and practices in biological and medical institutions.【Innovation/limitation】 This study compares and analyzes relevant
research at home and abroad. Future scientific data governance research can be improved in terms of research methods, application ar⁃
eas, institutional mechanisms, collaborative governance.