情报科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 49-60.

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

可计量的开放科学数据集影响力评价指标体系构建研究

  

  • 出版日期:2023-08-01 发布日期:2023-08-22

  • Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-22

摘要:

【目的/意义】开放科学迈入全球共识新阶段,构建可计量的开放科学数据影响力评价指标体系,将为我国
科学数据共享成效量化评价提供参考方案,对完善数据战略、释放科学数据价值和增加国际科技话语权具有重要
意义。【方法/过程】基于文献调研法和国家科学数据中心工作实践,设置可计量的开放科学数据集影响力评价指
标,采用专家打分法筛选指标;运用层次分析法对具有科学性、代表性和全面性的样本和指标进行量化研究,实现
指标体系所涵盖的所有指标项可计量和各指标的权重可计量。【结果/结论】本文构建可计量的开放科学数据集影
响力评价指标体系,涵盖学术影响力、决策影响力、社会影响力、国际影响力和经济影响力 5个一级指标及 24个二
级指标。结论表明:开放科学数据集支撑的学术成果、社会影响、政府决策和国际合作等是其影响力评价指标体系
的重要组成,科学数据的经济价值得到广泛认同。【创新/局限】基于调研和实践,本文依据多领域科学数据权威专
家数据构建了可计量的开放科学数据集评价指标体系。受限于篇幅,实证研究有待进一步展开。

Abstract:

【Purpose/significance】 Open science has entered a new stage of global consensus. Building a measurable open scientific
dataset influence evaluation indicator system can effectively quantify the influence of open science data in China, and provide a basis for improving strategic policy formulation, releasing the value of scientific data, and enhancing China's international discourse power in the field of scientific data.【Method/process】 This article constructs measurable characteristic indicators based on literature research and work practice, and uses expert scoring method to screen and determine evaluation indicators; AHP is used to obtain the weight of all evaluation indicators by quantifying the selected full-view, scientific and representative samples and indicators.【Result/conclu⁃sion】 This article constructs an measurable influence evaluation indicator system of open scientific dataset that can be measured from a full view, including 5 first-level indicators of academic influence, decision-making influence, social influence, international influ⁃ence and economic influence, as well as 24 second-level indicators. It is concluded that the academic achievements, social impact,government decision-making and international cooperation supported by the open scientific dataset are important components of scien⁃tific data influence evaluation, and the economic value of scientific dataset is widely recognized currently.【Innovation/limitation】Combined with the evaluation data of authoritative experts, the measurable open scientific dataset evaluation index system is con⁃structed by using the AHP to provide reference for quantitative evaluation data. Limited by the length of the article, the empirical re⁃search on quantitative evaluation of scientific dataset has not been carried out yet.