情报科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 93-101.

• 业务研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多维决策属性的科研合作者推荐研究 

  

  • 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-08-05

  • Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-08-05

摘要: 【目的/意义】为帮助学者省时省力地发掘出更多潜在科研合作者,建立高效科研合作。【方法/过程】本文提
出基于多维决策属性的科研合作者推荐模型,将学者选择科研合作者的因素划分为可合作性和易合作性两个维
度,其中可合作性包括学者研究方向度量、权威程度和活跃程度;易合作性维度侧重考虑目标学者对科研合作者年
龄、性别的偏好以及彼此建立合作的难易程度。【结果
/结论】通过获取“情报学”领域实例数据,验证了该模型的科
学性和有效性。【创新
/局限】本文在精确表征学者研究兴趣的基础上,从认知等层面挖掘多维科研合作者决策属
性,为科研合作者推荐提供了可行思路,对构建高质量科研合作具有重要意义。但本研究面向的是发表论文层面
的科研合作,未考虑学者联合承担项目等其他方面的合作,后续还需进一步完善。

Abstract: Purpose/significanceTo help scholars discover more potential scientific research collaborators in a time-saving and laborsaving manner,establish efficient scientific research cooperation. Method/processThis paper proposes a scientific research collabora⁃tor recommendation model based on multi-dimensional decision attributes,which divides the factors for scholars to select scientific re⁃search collaborators into two dimensions: cooperatability and easy cooperation. Cooperatability includes the measurement of scholars' research direction,authority and activityEasy cooperation dimension focuses on the preference of target scholars for the age and gen⁃der of scientific research collaborators and the difficulty of establishing cooperation with each other. Result/conclusionBy obtaining
the information of relevant scholars in the field of "information science",the scientificity and effectiveness of the model are verified
. In⁃novation/limitationBased on the accurate representation of scholars' research interests,this paper excavates the decision-making attri⁃butes of multi-dimensional scientific research collaborators from the cognitive level,provides feasible ideas for the recommendation of scientific research collaborators,and is of great significance to the construction of high-quality scientific research cooperation. How⁃ever,this study aims at the scientific research cooperation at the level of publishing papers,and does not consider the cooperation of scholars in jointly undertaking projects and other aspects,which needs to be further improved in the follow-up.