情报科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 3-11.

• 专论 •    下一篇

基于用户需求的高校图书馆数字资源服务质量评价研究

  

  • 出版日期:2022-03-01 发布日期:2022-03-08

  • Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-03-08

摘要: 【目的/意义】为了改善传统评价的主观性和模糊性,更好地体现高校图书馆数字资源用户需求,在用户贡
献指标的基础上构建服务质量评价体系,基于灰色关联分析构建GA-BPNN模型用于高校图书馆数字资源服务质
量评价。【方法/过程】从用户需求的角度征询用户意见,提炼影响服务质量评价的关键要素,在实证分析的基础上
构建了一个相对科学、合理的初步评价模型。然后采集样本,以灰色关联度表征服务质量评价结果。最后应用
MATLAB 进行仿真实验,对比分析 GA-BPNN 模型及标准 BPNN 模型的表现优劣。【结果/结论】GA 优化后的
BPNN的性能得到改善,预测值更接近真实值,容错性高,稳定性好,期望对高校及其他图书馆数字资源建设、服务
质量评价及服务创新研究有参考作用。【创新/局限】提出一种基于用户需求的高校图书馆数字资源服务质量评价
方法,主要局限是调查数据覆盖范围不够全面。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】 In order to improve the subjectivity and fuzziness of traditional evaluation and better reflect the de‐
mands of users,an evaluation system of digital resource service quality of academic libraries is constructed on the basis of the indexes
that users contribute,and using grey correlation analysis.GA-BPNN model is proposed to evaluate the service quality of digital resourc‐
es of academic libraries【. Method/process】The paper consults users' opinions from the perspective of their demands,extracts the key elements that affect the evaluation of digital resource service quality in academic libraries,and builds a relatively scientific and reason‐able hypothetical model by means of empirical analysis.Then,samples are collected and the results of service quality evaluation are represented by grey correlation degree.Finally,MATLAB R2019b is used to conduct simulation experiments,the performance of GA?BPNN model and BPNN model are compared and analyzed.【Results/conclusions】The actual output of GA-BPNN is close to user's
subjective evaluation results,and the accuracy and stability of GA-BPNN are significantly better than the BPNN model,which reflects
the feasibility and rationality of the evaluation model.It is expected to provide some references for the research on digital resources con‐struction,service quality evaluation and service innovation of academic libraries and other libraries【. Innovation/limitation】The paper puts forward a method to evaluate academic libraries’digital resource service quality based on user demand.The main limitation is that the coverage of survey data is not comprehensive enough.