Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2022, Vol. 36 Issue (5): 43-50    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.05.006
  档案法规标准 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
档案安全行政执法与刑事司法衔接制度的系统构建
仝其宪
忻州师范学院法律系 忻州 034000
Systematic Construction of the Connection System Between Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of Archives Security
Qixian TONG
Department of Law, Xinzhou Teachers University, Xinzhou 034000
全文: HTML    PDF(1022 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

档案安全行政执法与刑事司法衔接的问题,制约着我国档案事业的顺利发展,档案法与刑法之间的科学衔接是法律有效实施的重要前提。对于档案违法犯罪的规制,档案法是刑法的前置基础,刑法是档案法的有力保障,二者的有效衔接至关重要。但是,当前的主要问题是档案安全行刑衔接制度在立法衔接、案件移送、证据转换、监督机制等方面存在一定的漏洞,导致档案执法部门与公安司法机关在处理档案违法犯罪的具体实施过程中遭遇堵塞。为实现档案安全领域行刑衔接制度的公正、高效运行,加强对档案违法犯罪行为的规制,应进一步建立健全档案安全行刑衔接立法以及完善案件移送机制、健全证据转换规则、构建行刑衔接的信息共享平台、完善监督机制等制度规范,保障档案安全,促进档案事业发展。

Abstract

The connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice of archives security restricts the smooth development of archives undertaking in China. The scientific connection between Archives Law and Criminal Law is an important prerequisite for the effective implementation of the law. For the regulation of archives crimes, Archives Law is the prefoundation of Criminal Law, and Criminal Law is the strong guarantee of Archives Law. The effective connection between the two laws is crucial. However, the main problem at present is that there are some loopholes in the connection system of archives security execution in terms of legislative connection, case transfer, evidence conversion and supervision mechanism, resulting in blockage in the specific implementation process of dealing with archives violations and crimes between archival law enforcement departments and public security and judicial organs. In order to realize the fair and efficient operation of the execution connection system in the field of archives security and strengthen the regulation of archives illegal and criminal acts, we should further establish and improve the legislation of the execution connection of archives security, improve the case transfer mechanism, improve the evidence conversion rules, build an information sharing platform for the execution connection, improve the supervision mechanism and other institutional norms, so as to ensure the safety of archives and promote the development of archives undertaking.

出版日期: 2022-10-25
引用本文:

仝其宪. 档案安全行政执法与刑事司法衔接制度的系统构建[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(5): 43-50.
Qixian TONG. Systematic Construction of the Connection System Between Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of Archives Security. Archives Science Study, 2022, 36(5): 43-50.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.05.006      或      http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2022/V36/I5/43

[1] 相关文献:陈忠海. 论档案行政执法与刑事司法的衔接[J]. 档案学研究, 2014(18):18-22;仝其宪. 论档案执法司法的有效衔接[J]. 档案与建设,2019(8):33-36.
[2] [15] 仝其宪. 论档案行政执法与刑事司法衔接中的证据转换[J]. 档案学通讯, 2020(5):99-104.
[3] [11][16] 蒋云飞. 论档案行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制的完善[J]. 档案学通讯, 2021(5):78-86.
[4] 就行刑执法与刑事司法衔接的一般性问题研究成果较多, 较为代表性的成果有:元明. 行政执法与刑事司法衔接的理论与实践[J]. 人民检察, 2011(12):116-120;练育强. 行政执法与刑事司法衔接制度[J]. 政法论坛,2017(5):167-175.
[5] 吴小帅. 论刑法与生物安全法的规范衔接[J]. 法学, 2020(12):36-48.
[6] 周兆进. 环境行政执法与刑事司法衔接的法律省思[J]. 法学论坛, 2020(1):135-142.
[7] 相关文献:张伟珂. 食品安全行刑衔接机制的理论与实践[J]. 北京:法律出版社, 2017;舒洪水. 论我国食品安全犯罪行刑衔接制度之建构[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2016(3):122-133.
[8] 张道许. 知识产权保护中“两法衔接”机制研究[J]. 行政法学研究, 2012(2):103-108.
[9] 马秋影. 论《档案法》中法律责任制度的完善—以112件档案违法违纪案例为样本[J]. 档案学研究, 2018(6):31-34.
[10] 姚明. 档案犯罪刑事惩治研究:反思与重构[J]. 档案学研究, 2020(5):44-49.
[12] 刘子良. 伪造、篡改档案行为的刑事可罚性研究—以[J]. 档案管理, 2021(2):9-12.
[13] 仝其宪. 数字网络时代档案安全保护的刑法治理研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2021(3):33-39.
[14] 仝其宪. 论我国档案犯罪的行刑实体性衔接[J]. 档案学通讯, 2017(1):99-104.
[17] 证据材料转化为证据必须具有证据的合法性、客观性和关联性等特性,通常称为证据的“三性”,
[18] 仝其宪. 《档案法》与《刑法》衔接视域下档案犯罪刑事责任重构[J]. 档案学研究, 2015(5):54-59.
[19] 陈兴良. 刑法的启蒙[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018:18.
[20] 仝其宪. 论档案执法司法的有效衔接[J]. 档案与建设, 2019(8):33-36.
[21] 胡可征. 广东省档案局正式加入“两法衔接”工作联席会议[J]. 中国档案, 2016(9):10.
No related articles found!