Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2022, Vol. 36 Issue (2): 128-134    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.02.018
  档案史料研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
科举档案:唐宋贡籍及其演变
陈锴
山东大学历史文化学院 济南 250100
Imperial Examination Archives: Gong Registry in the Tang and Song Dynasties and Its Evolution
CHEN Kai
School of History and Culture, Shandong University, Jinan 250100
全文: HTML    PDF(1061 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

随着科举制度的发展,作为贡举人名单的贡籍在唐代产生,但它成为一件科举档案则始于宋代,主要记载贡举人的个人资料与考试情况,是贡举人地位得到提升的反映。为了更好地管理和安抚贡举人,宋代政府编制贡籍,并在此基础上叙理举数,推行免解和特奏名制度,同时殿举、除名等惩罚之制以及贡举人经济、法律等特权的获得亦依托于贡籍。但在明清时代,随着“科举必由学校”逐渐成为现实,政府加强对基层士人的管理,贡籍进一步下移,学籍得到扩展,政府所掌握档案由得解举人扩展为广大生员。这一定程度上削弱了举人贡籍的独立性,但礼部仍然通过贡籍的替代品保留对举人的有效管辖。

关键词 贡籍学籍科举档案举人    
Abstract

Gong registry, which is a list of provincial graduates, was created in the Tang Dynasty with the development of the imperial examination system. However, it became an archive of the imperial examination in the Song Dynasty, which mainly recorded the personal information and examinations of provincial graduates. It was a reflection of the elevated status of the group of provincial graduates. In order to better manage and appease the group of provincial graduates, the government of the Song Dynasty compiled the list of provincial graduates. And on basis of this, the Song Dynasty government also recorded the number of passing the regional examination, and established a system of exemption from the regional and national examination. At the same time, the system of punishments such as disqualification temporarily or permanently and the reward mechanism such as economic and legal privileges relied on the Gong registry. But in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the imperial examinations must be by the school, the government to strengthen the management of low-level scholars. So Gong registry further moved down and the school registry expanded. The government held the archives range of sources expanding from provincial graduates to the majority of students. This somewhat weakened the independence of Gong registry, but the Ministry of Rites still retained effective management over provincial graduates through the archives.

Key wordsGong registry    school registry    the imperial examination archives    provincial graduates
出版日期: 2023-04-18
引用本文:

陈锴. 科举档案:唐宋贡籍及其演变[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(2): 128-134.
CHEN Kai. Imperial Examination Archives: Gong Registry in the Tang and Song Dynasties and Its Evolution. Archives Science Study, 2022, 36(2): 128-134.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.02.018      或      http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2022/V36/I2/128

[1] 李全祥, 王铁莲. 我国古代人事档案考(续完)[J]. 档案学通讯,1990(5):43-45;佩弦. 我国古代的用人制度和唐代的甲历档案[J]. 上海档案工作,1990(1):56-58;张东光. 唐代官员的人事档案略说[J]. 档案, 2017(1):22-27.
[2] 刘海峰. 科举文献与科举学[J]. 台大历史学报,2003(32):277-287;刘建臻. 清代科考履历档案综论[J]. 档案学通讯,2007(5):89-92;马镛. 清代乡会试同年齿录研究[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术文献出版社, 2013.
[3] 朱瑞熙. 宋高宗科举制度的重建与改革[J]. 科举学论丛, 2007(2):5.
[4] [7][8][26] 董诰, 等 全唐文[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1983:8891,7639,9344,9039.
[5] [11] 王定保. 唐摭言[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1978: 1,13-15.
[6] [35] 刘昫, 等. 旧唐书[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1975:4033,4648;3431.
[9] 王禹偁. 小畜集[M]// 四库全书(第1086册). 台北:台湾商务印书馆, 1986: 127.
[10] 阮爱东. 唐代科举集阅考[J]. 重庆师范大学学报, 2020(6):75-81.
[12] 李国荣. 唐代科举档案—甲历[J]. 中国考试, 1999(4):52-53.
[13] 傅璇琮. 唐代科举与文学[M]. 西安: 陕西人民出版社, 1986:47-50.
[14] 林岩. 北宋科举考试与文学[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2006:22-23.
[15] [16][17][19][20][22][24][27][28][29][30][31][41] (清)徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M]. 刘琳,刁忠民,舒大刚,等,校点. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2014:5315,5323,5564,5568,5286,5339,5339-5340,5337,5290,6282,5554,5372,5297.
[18] [21] 脱脱阿鲁图, 铁木儿塔识, 等. 宋史[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1977: 3627,3605.
[23] 司马光. 司马光集[M]. 李文泽,霞绍晖,校点. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2010:1083-1084.
[25] 李焘. 续资治通鉴长编[M]. 北京:中华书局, 2004:1729-1730.
[32] 宋濂. 元史[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1976: 2027.
[33] 王宇信, 杨升南. 中国政治制度通史(第二卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1996:376-381.
[34] 阎步克. 察举制度变迁史稿[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社, 1991:312-315.
[36] 欧阳修, 宋祁. 新唐书[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1975: 1164.
[37] 王安石. 王文公文集[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1974: 363.
[38] 吴铮强. 科举理学化[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2008:124-151.
[39] 楼劲. 科举制投牒自举之法溯源[J]. 历史研究, 2019(1):55-71.
[40] 俞启定. 中国教育通史(秦汉卷)[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2013:130-135.
[42] 郭培贵. 中国科举制度通史(明代卷)[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2017:91-133.
[43] 孙承泽. 春明梦余录[M]//四库全书(第868册). 台北:台湾商务印书馆, 1986: 652.
[44] 赵汝愚. 宋朝诸臣奏议[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1999: 870.
[45] (元)佚名. 宋季三朝政要笺证[M]. 王瑞来笺证. 北京:中华书局, 2010: 342.
[46] 周密. 癸辛杂识[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1988: 314.
[47] 陈宝良. 明代生员层的经济特权及其贫困化[J]. 中国社会经济史研究, 2002(2):57-64.
[48] [49][50][54] 陈宝良. 明代儒学生员与地方社会[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2005:244-245.
[51] 陈宝良. 晚明生员的弃巾之风及其山人化[J]. 史学集刊, 2000(2):36.
[52] 申时行, 等. 大明会典[M]// 续修四库全书(第790册). 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1996: 398.
[53] 杜受田, 等. 钦定科场条例[M]// 续修四库全书(第829册). 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1996:751-752.
No related articles found!