AbstractObjective To explore the feasibility of the volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) auto-planning based on template library (TL). Methods VMAT plans of 68 patients diagnosed with postoperative rectal cancer in Eclipse system were retrospectively selected. The prescription dose was 50 Gy/25F. In 19 patients, the feature values of target and organs at risk were extracted as the vectors. The final optimized restricted conditions were saved as the TL. Then, the plans of 15 rectal cancer patients (10 cases from TL and 5 outside TL) were automatically optimized. According to the multi-dimensional vector similarity principle, the similarity parameter αwas defined. The designed program automatically selected the optimal-object template in an in-house software developed with Matlab. The dosimetric parameters of the auto-optimized plans with the optimal-object template (ATP) and the clinical plan (CP) were compared by the paired t-test. The changes in the dosimetric parameters and similarity parameter α were statistically compared by Pearson′s correlation analysis. The linear fitting of the dosimetric parameters with α was used by least squares method to explore the tendency of the ATP dosimetric parameters relative to CP. Results The dosimetric parameters of ATP for 13 cases were slightly worse than those of CP. The conformal index (P=0.004), heterogeneous index (P=0.015), V40(P=0.003) and mean dose (P=0.022) of the intestine significantly differed. The α values of these 13 cases were 2.67,2.60,2.60,2.49,2.67,2.74,2.72,2.48,2.53,2.86,2.68,2.56 and 2.63. The α value was significantly correlated with the V40 or mean dose of the bladder (r=0.649 and 0.603,P=0.016 and 0.029).Along with the increase of α value,V40 and meandose of the intestine for ATP were gradually deteriorated than those of CP. The remaining dosimetric para-meters of ATP were close to or superior to those of CP. Conclusions The results of ATP are slightly worse than those of CP, whereas can satisfy the clinical requirements. The TL, the quality of TL and ATP remain to be further optimized.
Fund:Chinese PLA General Hospital support Fund (2017FC-WJFWZX-06);State Key Research and Development Program Project (2017YFC0112100);National Natural Science Foundation Project (61601012)
Wang Xiaoshen,Yang Tao,Cong Xiaohu et al. A preliminary study of template library-based auto-planning of volume modulated arc therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2018, 27(9): 839-844.
Wang Xiaoshen,Yang Tao,Cong Xiaohu et al. A preliminary study of template library-based auto-planning of volume modulated arc therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2018, 27(9): 839-844.
[1] 石丽婉,傅丽蓉,哈晦明,等.胸中段食管癌根治性放疗三维适形放疗与调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2012,29(1):3104-3107.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2012.01.006. Shi LW, Fu LR,?Ha HM,et al. Dosimetric analysis of preoperative three dimensional conformal and preoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy for middle esophageal cancer[J].Chin J Phys,2012,29(1):3104-3107.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2012.01.006. [2] Skarpman-Munter,J,Sjölund J.Dose-volume histogram prediction using density estimation[J].Phys Med Biol,2015,60(17):6923-6936.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/60/17/6923. [3] Song T,Stau D,Chen M,et al. Patient-specific dosimetric endpoints based treatment plan quality control in radiotherapy[J].Phys Med Biol,2015,60(21):8213-8227.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/8213. [4] Shiraishi S,Tan J,Olsen,L,et al. Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery[J].Med Phys,2015,42(2):908-917.DOI:10.1118/1.4906183. [5] Shiraishi S,Moore KL. Knowledge-based prediction of three-dimensional dose distributions for external beam radiotherapy[J].Med Phys,2016,43(1):378-387.DOI:10.1118/1.4938583. [6] Sheng Y,Li T,Zhang,Y,et al. Atlas-guided prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning[J].Phys Med Biol,2015,60(18):7277-7291.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/60/18/7277. [7] Wu B,Ricchetti,F,Sanguineti,G,et al. Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control[J].Med Phys,2009,36(12):5497-5505.DOI:10.1118/1.3253464. [8] Hansen CR,Bertelsen A,Hazell I,et al. Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans[J].Clin Transl Rad Oncol,2016,119(?):S396-S397.DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2016.08.001. [9] Hazell I,Bzdusek K,Kumar P,et al. Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2016,17(1):272-282.DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5901. [10] Chang AT,Hung AW,Cheung FW,et al. Comparison of planning quality and efficiency between conventional and knowledge-based algorithms in nasopharyngeal cancer patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2016,95(3):981-990.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.017. [11] Hussein M, South C P, Barry M A, et al. Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy[J]. Radiotherapy& Oncology, 2016, 120(3):473-479.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.022. [12] Berry S L, Ma R, Boczkowski A, et al. Evaluating inter-campus plan consistency using a knowledge based planning model[J]. Radiotherapy& Oncology, 2016, 120(2):349-355. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.010. [13] Wu B,Ricchetti F,Sanguineti G,et al. Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,79(4):1241-1247.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.026.
2018, Vol. 27 
