Catalyst系统在乳腺癌患者放疗摆位应用及影响因素分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2018.02.014

Abstract
Figure/Table
References()
Related Citation (15)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinical application of Catalyst system in patient positioning during breast cancer radiotherapy, and to analyze its correlation with age and body mass index (BMI). Methods Twenty-four patients with breast cancer who were admitted to our hospital from May to August, 2016 were enrolled as subjects. For all patients, auxiliary positioning was made by the optical surface imaging system (C-Rad Catalyst) before each treatment. The kV-kV imaging was executed weekly to verify positioning. Age, BMI, and setup errors of the two systems in the anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and left-right (LR) directions were recorded and analyzed by independent samples t-test and Pearson correlation analysis. Results The C-Rad Catalyst system had a significantly larger setup error in the AP direction than the kV-kV imaging (0.22±0.17 vs. 0.18±0.13 cm, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in setup errors in the SI or LR direction between the two systems (0.23±0.18 vs. 0.19±0.15 cm, P>0.05;0.28±0.28 vs. 0.20±0.15 cm, P>0.05). Age and BMI of patients had significant impacts on the C-Rad Catalyst system but the kV-kV imaging (P>0.05):there were significant differences in setup errors in the AP and SI directions between patients ≤44 years of age and those 45-59 years of age (all P<0.05);there were significant differences in setup errors in the AP and LR directions between patients ≤44 years of age and those ≥60 years of age (all P<0.05);there was a significant difference in setup error in the LR direction between patients 45-59 years of age and those ≥60 years of age (P<0.05);there was a significant difference in setup error in the SI direction between patients with BMIs of<25 and ≥25 kg/m²(P<0.05). For patients ≥60 years of age, setup error of the C-Rad Catalyst system in the SI direction was correlated with age (r=-0.496, P<0.05). For patients with BMI of<25 kg/m², setup error of the C-Rad Catalyst system in the AP direction was correlated with BMI (r=-0.445,P<0.05). For patients with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m², setup error of the C-Rad Catalyst system in the SI direction was correlated with BMI (r=-0.252,P<0.05). Conclusions There is significant difference in setup error in the AP direction between the C-Rad Catalyst system and the kV-kV imaging. Age and BMI have impacts on patient positioning by the C-Rad Catalyst system.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Luo Huanli
	Peng Haiyan
	Jin Fu
	Xiao Peng
	Cao Shaoai
	He Yanan
	Dong Wenling
	Li Xuemin
	Yang Dingyi
	Wang Ying

Key words： Breast neoplasms/radiotherapy Radiotherapy planning, computer-assisted C-Rad Catalyst Setup error

Received: 22 January 2017

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (11575038);Medical Research Project of Chongqing Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission (2015MSXM229)

Corresponding Authors: Jin Fu,Email:jfazj@126.com;Wang Ying,Email:wangying_cq@hotmail.com

Cite this article:

Luo Huanli,Peng Haiyan,Jin Fu et al. Catalyst system in patient positioning during breast cancer radiotherapy:clinical application and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2018, 27(2): 190-194.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2018.02.014 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/Y2018/V27/I2/190

[1] Harsolia A,Kestin L,Grills I,et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,68(5):1375-1380.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.044.
[2] van Herk M,Remeijer P,Rasch C,et al. The probability of correct target dosage:dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47(4):1121-1135.DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00518-6.
[3] 徐子海,童蕾,陈磊,等.基于CTVision图像引导的乳腺癌术后患者调强放疗摆位误差测量与分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(6):870-873,877.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.023.Xu ZH,Tong L,Chen L,et al. Measurement and analysis of patients′ set-up errors in CTVision images-guided radiotherapy after breast cancer operation[J].Chin J Med Phys,2015,32(6):870-873,877.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.023.
[4] 李岩,刘莉莉,梁莉丽,等.影像引导对乳腺癌调强放射治疗精度的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2013,13(35):6913-6917.DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2013.35.050.Li Y,Liu LL,Liang LL,et al. Using Image guide radiotherapy enhanced the radiotherapy precision of breast cancer in intensity modulated radiotherapy[J].Prog Mod Biomed,2013,13(35):6913-6917.DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2013.35.050.
[5] 胡健,徐利明,姚颐,等.KV-KV、KV-MV和CBCT在头颈部调强放疗位置验证中的对比研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2010,27(4):1988-1992.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2010.04.010.Hu J,Xu LM,Yao Y,et al. The comparation of 2D kilovoltage with kilovoltage-megavoltage radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography in position verification of head and neck intensity modulate radiotherapy[J].Chin J Med Phys,2010,27(4):1988-1992.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2010.04.010.
[6] Wikström K,Nilsson K,Isacsson U,et al. A comparison of patient position displacements from body surface laser scanning and cone beam CT bone registrations for radiotherapy of pelvic targets[J].Acta Oncol,2014,53(2):268-277.DOI:10.3109/0284186X.2013.802836.
[7] Pallotta S,Russo S,Esposito M,et al. PO-0978:testing the C-RAD Catalyst elastic image registration software using a deformable female phantom[J].Radiother Oncol,2015,115(Suppl 1):S520-S521.DOI:10.1016/S0167-8140(15)40970-3.
[8] Stanley D,Rasmussen K,Kirby N,et al. SU-F-J-20:commissioning and acceptance testing of the C-Rad CatalystHD surface imaging system[J].Med Phys,2016,43(6):3410.DOI:10.1118/1.4955928.
[9] World Health Organization. The world health report 2002:reducing risks,promoting healthy life[R].Switzerland:World Health Organization,2002.
[10] Moser T,Habl G,Uhl M,et al. Clinical evaluation of a laser surface scanning system in 120 patients for improving daily setup accuracy in fractionated radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2013,85(3):846-853.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.026.
[11] Wiencierz M,Kruppa K,LÜdemann L.Clinical validation of two surface imaging systems for patient positioning in percutaneous radiotherapy[J].arXiv:1602.03749,2016.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.03749.pdf.
[12] Stieler F,Wenz F,Shi M,et al. A novel surface imaging system for patient positioning and surveillance during radiotherapy[J].Strahlenther Onkol,2013,189(11):938-944.DOI:10.1007/s00066-013-0441-z.
[13] Gopan O,Wu QW.Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,84(2):547-552.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.004.
[14] Kügele M.Evaluation of the catalyst system for patient positioning during breast cancer treatment[D].Malmö,Sweden:Lung University,2012.
[15] Mitine C,Dutreix A,Van der Schueren E.Tangential breast irradiation:influence of technique of set-up on transfer errors and reproducibility[J].Radiother Oncol,1991,22(4):308-310.DOI:10.1016/0167-8140(91)90168-G.
[16] .Everett JS,Fargo JD,Sommers MS.Factors protecting skin from injury:relationships between age,skin colour and skin elasticity[J].Inj Prev,2010,16(Suppl 1):A236.DOI:10.1136/ip.2010.029215.840.
[17] .Gerhardt LC,Lenz A,Spencer ND,et al. Skin-textile friction and skin elasticity in young and aged persons[J].Skin Res Technol,2009,15(3):288-298.DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00363.x.
[18] 何英剑,陶秋山,李晓婷,等.性别、年龄对成人BMI超重与肥胖诊断标准影响[J].中国公共卫生,2009,25(4):441-443.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2009.04.021.He YJ,Tao QS,Li XT,et al. Influences of gender and age on correlation of BMI and BF% in adult[J].Chin J Public Health,2009,25(4):441-443.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2009.04.021.