[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for rectal cancer based on Auto-Planning
Li Kaixuan,Chang Xi,Wang Jiazhou,Chen Zhi,Wang Junqi,Zhang Zhen,Wan Juefeng,Hu Weigang
Department of Radiation Oncology (Li KX,Chang X,Wang JZ,Wang JQ,Zhang Z,Wan JF,Hu WG),Proton Heavyion Center (Chen Z),Cancer Hospital of Fudan University,Department of Oncology,Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Department of Radiation Physics,Shanghai Proton Heavy Ion Hospital,Shanghai 210321(Chen Z)
Objective To determine whether Auto-Planning-based volumetric modulated radiotherapy (Auto-VMAT) planning can improve planning efficiency without compromising plan quality compared with current manual trial-and-error-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (Manual-VMAT) planning for patients with rectal cancer. Methods Ten patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ rectal cancer who underwent Dixon surgery were enrolled as subjects. The Pinnacle 9.10 planning system was used to design Manual-VMAT and Auto-VMAT plans. Dose distribution, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), Dmean values of different organs at risk or dose-volume histogram of regions of interest, total planning time, and manual planning time were compared between the two plans. The differences were analyzed by paired t test. Resutls Dosimetric prescriptions were achieved in both plans. There were no significant differences in HI or CI between the Auto-VMAT plans and the Manual-VMAT plans (0.058 vs. 0.058, P=0.972;0.921 vs. 0.940, P=0.115). Compared with the Manual-VMAT plans, the V40, Dmean, and D50% of the bladder were significantly reduced by 25.6%, 11.5%, and 8.9%, respectively, in the Auto-VMAT plans (P=0.004, 0.016, 0.001);the V40, Dmean, and D50% of the small intestine were also significantly reduced by 12.1%, 5.4%, and 6.8%, respectively, in the Auto-VMAT plans (P=0.023, 0.001, 0.001);the V30, Dmean, and D50% of the left and right femoral heads were slightly reduced in the Auto-VMAT plans. The Auto-VMAT plans had significantly longer total planning time but significantly shorter manual planning time than the Manual-VMAT plans (50.38 vs. 36.81 min, P=0.000;4.47 vs. 16.94 min, P=0.000). Conclutions Compared with the Manual-VMAT plans, the Auto-VMAT plans have substantially shorter manual planning time and improved planning efficiency.
Corresponding Authors:
Hu Weigang,Email:Jackhuwg@gmail.com
Cite this article:
Li Kaixuan,Chang Xi,Wang Jiazhou et al. Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for rectal cancer based on Auto-Planning[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(11): 1308-1312.
Li Kaixuan,Chang Xi,Wang Jiazhou et al. Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for rectal cancer based on Auto-Planning[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(11): 1308-1312.
[1] Yu CX,Tang G.Intensity-modulated arc therapy:principles,technologies and clinical implementation[J].Phys Med Biol,2011,56(5):31-54.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/56/5/R01.
[2] Teoh M,Clark CH,Wood K,et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy:a review of current literature and clinical use in practice[J].Br J Radiol,2011,84(1007):967-996.DOI:10.1259/bjr/22373346.
[3] Quan EM,Li XQ,Li YP,et al. A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,83(4):1169-1178.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.015.
[4] Bedford JL,Hansen VN,McNair HA,et al. Treatment of lung cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy and image guidance:a case study[J].Acta Oncol,2008,47(7):1438-1443.DOI:10.1080/02841860802282778.
[5] Oliver M,Ansbacher W,Beckham WA.Comparing planning time,delivery time and plan quality for IMRT,RapidArc and Tomotherapy[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2009,10(4):117-131.DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3068.
[6] Fogliata A,Wang PM,Belosi F,et al. Assessment of a model based optimization engine for volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer[J].Radiat Oncol,2014,9:54-59.DOI:10.1186/s13014-014-0236-0.
[7] Purdie TG,Dinniwell RE,Fyles A,et al. Automation and intensity modulated radiation therapy for individualized high-quality tangent breast treatment plans[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2014,90(3):688-695.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.056.
[8] 廖雄飞,Yang J,Chen Y,等.调强放疗计划多目标优化算法比较研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2013,22(4):305-308.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2013.04.012.
Liao XF,Yang J,Chen Y,et al. Study on multicriteria optimization of intensity–modulated radiotherapy planning comparing with direct machine parameter optimization[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2013,22(4):305-308.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2013.04.012.
[9] 王昊,邱杰,全红,等.前列腺癌多目标优化VMAT计划剂量学研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2015,24(1):82-85.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.01.022.
Wang H,Qiu J,Quan H,et al. Dosimetric study of multicriteria optimization volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for prostate cancer[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2015,24(1):82-85.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.01.022.
[10] Roels S,Duthoy W,Haustermans K,et al. Definition and delineation of the clinical target volume for rectal cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65(4):1129-1142.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.050.
[11] ICRU. Prescribing,recording,and reporting photon-beam intensity modulated radiation therapy[R].ICRU Report 83.Bethesda:ICRU,2010:36-50.
[12] van′t Riet A,Mak ACA,Moerland MA,et al. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation:application to the prostate[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1997,37(3):731-736.DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00601-3.
[13] Krayenbuehl J,Norton I,Studer G,et al. Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck[J].Radiat Oncol,2014,10:226.DOI:10.1186/ s13014-015-0533-2.
[14] Hazell I,Bzdusek K,Kumar P,et al. Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2016,17(1):272-282.DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5901.
2017, Vol. 26 
