Abstract Objective To evaluate the dosimetric differences of one RapidPlan Model on different Radiotherapy devices. Methods A RapidPlan Model was built based on 30 reoptimization IMRT plans of cervical cancer patients on type"A" LA.Dosimetric differences of automatic optimized IMRT plans using this model on 4 different type LAs,named respectively"A","B","C" and"D",were compared with 12 test cervical cancer cases. These four LAs were well commissioned in the treatment planning system (TPS).Student t test was applied for statistical analysis on dosimetric differences. Results Dosimetric differences between A vs. B,C and D were observed on Dmean,HI,CI of PTV50 and PTV45,as well as on V50,V40,V30 of rectum and bladder. Significant dosimetric differences were observed between A and D (P<0.05). Conclusions Automatic planning with RapidPlan model may result in dosimetric differences on different Radiotherapy devices. These differences should be aware of with caution in its clinical application.
Ren Jiangping,Tao Qingsong,Zhou Yingying et al. Dosimetric evaluation of RapidPlan model on different Radiotherapy devices[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(8): 924-928.
Ren Jiangping,Tao Qingsong,Zhou Yingying et al. Dosimetric evaluation of RapidPlan model on different Radiotherapy devices[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(8): 924-928.
[1] Good D,Lo J,Lee R,et al. A konwledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among threatment centers:An example application to prostate cancer planning[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2013,87(1):176-181.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.015. [2] Tol JP,Delaney AR,Dahele M,et al. Evalution of a konwledeg-based planning solution for head and neck cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2015,91(3):612-620.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.014. [3] Clipse photon and electron reference guide[R].Varian Medical Systems,Inc.2014. [4] 易俊林,高黎,黄晓东,等.416例鼻咽癌IMRT远期生存与影响因素分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(3):196-200.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2012.03.002. Yi JL,Gao L,Huang XD,et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy:long-term results of 416 patients[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2012,21(3):196-200.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2012.03.002.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2012.03.002 [5] 王玉祥,王军,祝淑钗,等.老年食管癌三维适形与IMRT疗效比较[J].肿瘤防治研究,2012,39(8):1008-1013.DOI:10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.08.031. Wang YX,Wang J,Zhu SC,et al. Comparison of prognosis on esopageal carcinoma treated with 3DCRT and IMRT for elderly patients[J].Cancer Res Prev Treat,2012,39(8):1008-1013.DOI:10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.08.031. [6] Hynds S,McGarry CK,Mitchell DM,et al. Assessing the daily consistency of bladder filling using an ultrasonic bladder scan device in men receiving radical eonformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer[J].Br J Radiol,2011,84(1005):813-818.DOI:10.1259/bjr/50048151 [7] Wu B,Ricchetti F,Sanguineti G,et al. Patient geometry-driven informationretrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control[J].Med Phys,2009,36(3):5497-5505.DOI:10.1118/1.3253464. [8] Reddy N,Nori D,Chang H,et al. Prostate and seminal vesicle volume based consideration of prostate cancer patients for treatment with 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy[J].Med Phys,2010,37(7):3791-3801.DOI:10.1118/1.3451125. [9] Moore KL,Brame RS,Low DA,et al. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,81(3):545-551.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.030. [10] Hunt MA,Jackson A,Narayana A,et al. Geometric factors influencing dosimetric sparing of the parotid glands using IMRT[J].Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,66(3):296-304.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05028.
2017, Vol. 26 
