[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Dosimetric effects of air cavity on target volume and organs at risk during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Liu Zhiping,Tian Yuan,Wang Hongzhi,Luo Jingwei,Gao Li,Xu Guozhen
Department of Radiation Oncology,National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100021,China (Liu ZP now unit:Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150001,China)
Abstract Objective To evaluate the dosimetric effects of air cavity on primary tumor and organs at risk (OARs) during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Methods Nine patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma had CT simulation before treatment and on the 25 fraction of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy plan1 was first created by delineating the target volumes and OARs on the first CT image, which was then copied and merged with the second CT image. Air cavity that was formed following tumor volume regression was delineated on the first CT image, and the density of air cavity was set to zero. A new gross target volume (GTV) was formed by subtracting the air cavity from the original GTV, and the new CT image was named CTAir. Plan2 was then created by calculating the dose distribution on CTAir using the same portals and parameters as Plan1. Assuming that Plan1 and Plan2 were both used throughout the course of radiotherapy, the dosimetric parameters of nasopharyngeal tumor and OARs in the absence and presence of air cavity were then compared using the paired t-test. Results Dmean, D95, D90, D10, and D5 of tumor were significantly higher in plan2 than in plan1(P=0.000, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, and 0.005, respectively), with a<0.5 Gy increase in dose. A dose build-up effect was observed within the tumor region posterior to the air cavity, where the highest dose was 1.4 cm posterior to the air cavity, resulting in a dose difference of 0.36 Gy. In addition, D2cc and D1cc of the brain stem were significantly higher in plan2 than in plan1(P=0.036 and 0.044, respectively). Dmax of the optical chiasm, left optical nerve, and right optical nerve were also increased in the presence of air cavity (P=0.438, 0.434, and 0.477, respectively), but the change in dose was<0.12 Gy. Conclusions Air cavity induces a small but negligible increase in the tumor and OARs dose in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during IMRT. However, closer monitoring should be conducted for patients with OARs that is close to or has surpassed tolerance prior to radiotherapy.
Fund:Peking Union Medical College Graduate Student Innovation Fund (2014-1002-3001)
Corresponding Authors:
Luo Jingwei,Email:nqluo202@ 163.com
Cite this article:
Liu Zhiping,Tian Yuan,Wang Hongzhi et al. Dosimetric effects of air cavity on target volume and organs at risk during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(8): 862-866.
Liu Zhiping,Tian Yuan,Wang Hongzhi et al. Dosimetric effects of air cavity on target volume and organs at risk during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(8): 862-866.
[1] 李先明,胡逸民,哈思衡,等.气腔对高能X线剂量分布的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1992,1(3):195-199. Li XM,Hu YM,Ha SH,et al. Influence of air cavity on the dose distribution of 8 MV X-ray[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,1992,1(3):195-199. [2] Paelinck L,Reynaert N,Thierens H,et al. The value of radiochromicfilm dosimetry around air cavities:experimental results and Monte Carlo simulations[J].Phys Med Biol,2003,48(13):1895-1905.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/48/13/303. [3] Richardson SL,Pino R.Dosimetric effects of an air cavity for the SAVITM partial breast irradiation applicator[J].Med Phys,2010,37(8):3919-3926.DOI:10.1118/1.3457328. [4] Swanpalmer J,Johansson KA.The effect of air cavity size in cylindrical ionization chambers on the measurements in high-energy radiotherapy photon beams-an experimental study[J].Phys Med Biol,2012,57(14):4671-4681.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/57/14/4671. [5] Zhang X,Li M,Cao J,et al. Dosimetric variations of target volumes and organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J].Br J Radiol,2012,85(1016):e506-e513.DOI:10.1259/bjr/20695672. [6] Petoukhova AL,Terhaard CHJ,Welleweerd H.Does 4 MV perform better compared to 6 MV in the presence of air cavities in the head and neck region?[J].Radiother Oncol,2006,79(2):203-207.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.04.002. [7] Behrens CF.Dose build-up behind air cavities for Co-60,4,6 and 8 MV.Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations[J].Phys Med Biol,2006,51(22):5937-5950.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/51/22/015. [8] 肖泽久,王建宇,钱渡江,等.高能X射线放疗中气腔问题探讨[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1994,3(3):189-191. Xiao ZJ,Wang JY,Qian DJ,et al. Air cavity problems during radiation therapy with high energy X-rays[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,1994,3(3):189-191. [9] Kan WK,Wu PM,Leung HT,et al. The effect of the nasopharyngeal air cavity on x-ray interface doses[J].Phys Med Biol,1998,43(3):529-537.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/43/3/005. [10] Fukumitsu N,Ishikawa H,Ohnishi K,et al. Dose distribution resulting from changes in aeration of nasal cavity or paranasal sinus cancer in the proton therapy[J].Radiother Oncol,2014,113(1):72-76.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2014.08.024.
2017, Vol. 26 
