[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Cellular response to fludarabine treatment in combination with different ionizing radiation in renal carcinoma 786-O cells
Song Lei,Liu Yong,Ma Weilin, Chen Linlin,Guo Zhong
Department of Medical Function (Song L,Guo ZH),Department of Biochemistry (Liu Y),Department of Clinical Medicine (Ma WL),Department of Nursing (Chen LL),Medical College of Northwest University for Nationalities,Lanzhou 730030,China
Objective To investigate DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitization in renalcarcinoma 786-O cells induced by fludarabine (FA) combined with different ionizing radiations. Methods The 786-O cells were exposed to FA combined with X-ray or heavy ion beam irradiation. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the percentage of γH2AX-positive cells and cell cycle. The neutral comet assay was used to detect DNA double-strand breaks. The colony-forming assay was used to evaluate the effects of different treatments on cell survival. Comparison between groups was made by one-way analysis of variance or Dunnet’s t test. Results Compared with FA alone or irradiation alone, FA combined with different ionizing radiations increased DNA double-strand breaks as shown by significantly increased levels of γH2AX (P=0.007,0.001);FA combined with heavy ion beam irradiation lead to a cell cycle block at the radiosensitive G2/M phase and significantly increased the expression of γH2AX in the G2/M phase (P=0.000,0.000);the neutral comet assay revealed that FA combined with irradiation significantly increased DNA sublethal damage (P=0.020,0.060);FA significantly reduced the colony-forming rate after irradiation (P=0.000,0.030;0.001,0.040). Conclusions FA enhances the effects induced by X-ray and heavy ion beam irradiation with different properties. Particularly, FA substantially enhances the cell death induced by heavy ion beam irradiation.
Song Lei,Liu Yong,Ma Weilin et al. Cellular response to fludarabine treatment in combination with different ionizing radiation in renal carcinoma 786-O cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2016, 25(6): 646-651.
Song Lei,Liu Yong,Ma Weilin et al. Cellular response to fludarabine treatment in combination with different ionizing radiation in renal carcinoma 786-O cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2016, 25(6): 646-651.
[1] Tam CS,O’Brien S,Plunkett W,et al. Long-term results of first salvage treatment in CLL patients treated initially with FCR (fludarabine,cyclophosphamide,rituximab)[J].Blood,2014,124(20):3059-3064.DOI:10.1182/blood-2014-06-583765. [2] Hui ZG,Tretiakova M,Zhang ZF,et al. Radiosensitization by inhibiting STAT1 in renal cell carcinoma[J].Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys,2009,73(1):288-295.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.043. [3] Rothkamm K,Barnard S,Moquet J,et al. DNA damage foci:Meaning and significance[J].Environ Mol Mutagen,2015,56(6):491-504.DOI:10.1002/em.21944. [4] Rogakou EP,Pilch DR,Orr AH,et al. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histoneH2AX phosphorylation on serine 139[J].J Biol Chem,1998,273(10):5858-5868.DOI:10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858. [5] GeriM,Gajski G,Garaj-Vrhovac V.γ-H2AX as a biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks in ecotoxicology[J].Ecotoxicol Environ Saf,2014,105:13-21.DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.035. [6] Brunborg G,Collins A,Graupner A,et al. Reference cells and ploidy in the comet assay[J].Front Genet,2015,6:61.DOI:10.3389/fgene.2015.00061. [7] Olive PL,Banáth JP.The comet assay:a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells[J].Nat Protoc,2006,1(1):23-29.DOI:10.1038/nprot.2006.5. [8] Su HF,Jin XC,Zhang XB,et al. FH535 increases the radiosensitivity and reverses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of radioresistant esophageal cancer cell line KYSE-150R[J].J Transl Med,2015,13(1):104.DOI:10.1186/s12967-015-0464-6. [9] Olive PL,Banáth JP,Durand RE.Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the"comet" assay[J].Radiat Res,1990,122(1):86-94.DOI:10.2307/3577587. [10] Olive PL,Banáth JP.Kinetics ofH2AX phosphorylation after exposure to cisplatin[J].Cytometry B Clin Cytom,2009,76B (2):79-90.DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.20450. [11] Beaton LA,Marro L,Malone S,et al. Investigating γH2AX as a biomarker of radiosensitivity using flow cytometry methods[J].ISRN Radiol,2013,2013:704659.DOI:10.5402/2013/704659. [12] Martin NT,Nahas SA,Tunuguntla R,et al. Assessing′radiosensitivity′ with kinetic profiles of γ-H2AX,53BP1 and BRCA1 foci[J].Radiother Oncol,2011,101(1):35-38.DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.065. [13] Méndez-Acua L,Di Tomaso MV,Palitti F,et al. Histone post-translational modifications in DNA damage response[J].Cytogenet Genome Res,2010,128(1-3):28-36.DOI:10.1159/000296275. [14] Friedrich T,Scholz U,Elssser T,et al. Systematic analysis of RBE and related quantities using a database of cell survival experiments with ion beam irradiation[J].J Radiat Res,2013,54(3):494-514.DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrs114. [15] Suzuki M,Kase Y,Yamaguchi H,et al. Relative biological effectiveness for cell-killing effect on various human cell lines irradiated with heavy-ion medical accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) carbon-ion beams[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48(1):241-250.DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00568-X. [16] Schlaff CD,Krauze A,Belard A,et al. Bringing the heavy:carbon ion therapy in the radiobiological and clinical context[J].Radiat Oncol,2014,9(1):88.DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-9-88. [17] Liu CH,Kawata T,Zhou GM,et al. Comparison of the repair of potentially lethal damage after low-and high-LET radiation exposure,assessed from the kinetics and fidelity of chromosome rejoining in normal human fibroblasts[J].J Radiat Res,2013,54(6):989-997.DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrt031. [18] Groesser T,Chang H,Fontenay G,et al. Persistence of γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci in proliferating and non-proliferating human mammary epithelial cells after exposure to γ-rays or iron ions[J].Int J Radiat Biol,2011,87(7):696-710.DOI:10.3109/09553002.2010.549535.
2016, Vol. 25 
