中华放射肿瘤学杂志
Wednesday, Apr. 16, 2025   Home | Journal | Editorial | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Academic | Index-in | Contact Us | Chinese
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology  2015, Vol. 24 Issue (2): 126-130    DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.02.000
Orignal Article Current Issue| Next Issue| Archive| Adv Search [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Comparison of target dosimetry and treatment outcome in patients with stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Wang Yuxiang, Tian Xiuming, Qiu Rong, Wang Lili, Zhu Shuchai
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
Download: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract  Objective To compare the target dosimetric distribution and clinical outcome in patients with stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods The clinical data of 419 patients with stage Ⅲ NSCLC treated with either 3DCRT or IMRT were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 338 male and 81 female patients, and the median age was 63 years (range:32-84 years). There were 340 patients treated with 3DCRT and 79 with IMRT, and the median prescribed dose was 60 Gy (range:50-76 Gy). One hundred and forty patients were treated with radiotherapy alone and 279 were treated with chemoradiotherapy. The target dosimetric distribution was evaluated with dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. The overall survival (OS) rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the log-rank test. Results When comparing the clinical data, the patients treated with 3DCRT were in older ages, and had advanced N and clinical stages (P=0.01, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively). When comparing the target DVH parameters, the patients treated with IMRT had larger planning target volume (PTV)(P=0.01), significantly lower clinical target volume (CTV) Dmean, CTV D90, PTV Dmean, and PTV V65-V60(P=0.05-0.01), significantly higher V5-V20 in both lungs, higher esophagus Dmean, longer esophagus in the radiation field, higher linear energy transfer between 45 and 55 keV/μm (LET45-LET55), and higher spinal cord Dmean(P=0.03-0.00). The follow-up rate was 97.4%. After radiotherapy, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 65.5%, 26.1%, and 18.5%, respectively, and the median survival time was 20 months. There were no significant differences in OS rate and the incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis between patients treated with IMRT and 3DCRT (P=0.06,0.73,0.13). Stratified analysis showed that, when comparing the patients treated with IMRT with those treated with 3DCRT, the survival rate was only lower in male patients, patients in stage T3-T4 or N0-N2, and those without chemotherapy (P=0.04,0.04,0.02,0.00). Conclusions The treatment outcomes of patients with stage Ⅲ NSCLC undergoing IMRT and 3DCRT are comparable. IMRT shows a potential dosimetric advantage, but the result needs further investigation.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Wang Yuxiang
Tian Xiuming
Qiu Rong
Wang Lili
Zhu Shuchai
Key words Lung neoplasms/three-dimensional radiotherapy      Dosimetry      Prognosis     
Received: 12 June 2014     
Cite this article:   
Wang Yuxiang,Tian Xiuming,Qiu Rong et al. Comparison of target dosimetry and treatment outcome in patients with stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(2): 126-130.
Wang Yuxiang,Tian Xiuming,Qiu Rong et al. Comparison of target dosimetry and treatment outcome in patients with stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(2): 126-130.
URL:  
http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.02.000     OR     http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_fszlx/EN/Y2015/V24/I2/126
  Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
Support by Beijing Magtech Co.ltd  support@magtech.com.cn