[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Gross tumor volume delineation with combination of non-contrast/contrast CT and FDG PET in pancreatic cancer
GONG Lin-lin*, LIU Ning-bo, ZHU Lei, YANG Cheng-wen, ZHAO Lu-jun, LI Rui-jian, WANG Ping
*Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Institute and Hospital of Tianjin Medical University;Tianjin Key laboratory of Tumor Research and Control;Tianjin 300060, China Corresponding author:WANG Ping,Email:wangping.9999@yahoo.com.cn
Abstract Objective To investigate the application of non-contrast and contrast-enhanced 18FDG PET/CT in the delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) of pancreatic cancer. Methods Between Jan.2008 and Dec.2009, twenty-one patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer or recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery in our hospital had both non-contrast CT and PET images acquired at the same body position. Among the whole group, eleven patients also had contrast CT images. The image data sets were transferred to the treatment planning workstation for registration. Then gross tumor volumes (GTV) were delineated independently using the information of PET images, contrast/non-contrast CT scan and contrast/non-contrast PET-CT fusion images. The differences of mean volume in these different sets of GTV were analyzed. Results For the whole group, the mean volume of non-contrast GTVCT, GTVPET, non-contrast GTVPET-CT were 76.9 cm3, 47.0 cm3 and 44.5 cm3, respectively. The mean volume of non-contrast GTVPET-CT was significantly smaller than non-contrast GTVCT(z=－3.91, P=0.000). For the eleven patients with contrast CT, the mean volume of contrast GTVCT, GTVPET, contrast GTVPET-CT were 64.1 cm3, 45.1 cm3 and 49.3 cm3,respectively. The mean volume of contrast GTVPET-CT was significantly smaller than contrast GTVCT(z=－2.13, P=0.033). No significant differences were found between contrast PET-CT and non-contrast PET-CT (z=－0.80,P=0.424). Conclusions Co-registration of PET and contrast/non-contrast CT information in pancreatic cancer may improve the accuracy of GTV delineation, and possibly reduce the adverse effect of irradiation.
GONG Lin-lin*,LIU Ning-bo,ZHU Lei et al. Gross tumor volume delineation with combination of non-contrast/contrast CT and FDG PET in pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2012, 21(3): 255-257.
GONG Lin-lin*,LIU Ning-bo,ZHU Lei et al. Gross tumor volume delineation with combination of non-contrast/contrast CT and FDG PET in pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2012, 21(3): 255-257.
[1] Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppanen MP, et al. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg, 2009,250∶957-963. [2] Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, et al. Validation of the6th edition AJCC pancreatic cancer staging system report from national cancer database. Cancer,2007,110:738-744. [3] Mukund S, Didolkar-Cardella W, Coleman-Mark J. Image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma results of first 85 patients. J Gastrointest Surg,2010,14:1547-1559. [4] Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, et al. Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxy glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions? Acta Gastroenterol Belg,2007,70:331-338. [5] Van Laere K, Ceyssens S, Van Calenbergh F, et al. Direct comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET in suspected recurrence of glioma:sensitivity, inter-observer variability and prognostic value. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag,2005,32:39-51. [6] 王天禄,李光,党军,等. PET-CT对非小细胞肺癌临床分期及三维适形放疗中靶区勾画的影响. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20:99-100. [7] 任瑞美,付正,于金明,等.FDG PET-CT在食管癌放疗靶区勾画中的作用.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18:429-430. [8] Fox JL, Rengan R, O′Meara W, et al. Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,62:70-75. [9] Topkan E, Yavuz AA, Aydin M, et al. Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. J Exp Clin Can Res,2008,27:27-41. [10] Buchs NC, Bühler L, Bucher P,et al. Value of contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer:a prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2011,26:657-662. [11] Strobel K, Heinrich S, Bhure U,et al. Contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT:1-stop-shop imaging for assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer. J Nucl Med,2008,49:1408-1413.
2012, Vol. 21 
