[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Significance of primary tumor volume on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy
CHEN Chuan-ben*, PAN Jian-ji, CHEN Li-sha, BAI Peng-gang, LIN Shao-jun, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Xiu-chun, FEI Zhao-dong
*Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Fujian Province, Teach Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350014, China
Corresponding author:PAN Jian-ji, Email:panjianji@126.com
Objective To analyze the correlation between primary tumor volume (PTV) and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods 330 NPC patients treated by IMRT were included. Pretreatment computerized tomography image were input into tree-dimensional treatment-planning system, in which the primary tumor volume were calculated automatically. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best cut-off point of PTV. Within the framework of UICC 2002 T stage,The PTV was divided into four groups:V1<10 cm3, V2 10-25 cm3, V3>25-50 cm3 and V4>50 cm3. Kaplan-Meier and Logrank test was used to analyze the survival, Cox proportion risk regression model were used to analysis the correlation between PTV and prognosis. Results The mean PTV for all NPC patients was (34.2±27.1) cm3 with the range of 0.4-153.7 cm3. The 3-year overall survival for V1, V2, V3 and V4 stage were 88.6%,90.0%,91.2% and 74.2%, respectively (χ2=12.83,P=0.005). There was no significant difference among V1, V2 and V3 in terms of overall survival (χ2=1.96,P=0.376). The 3-year distant metastasis-free survival and diseases-free survival or overall survival were decrease in PTV>50 cm3 and PTV≤50 cm3 (77.4%∶89.9%, χ2=7.24, P=0.007and 64.5%∶85.1%, χ2=13.95,P=0.000 or 74.2%∶90.3%, χ2=11.76,P=0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that PTV was a adverse prognostic factors for overall survival (χ2=0.00,P=2.580). Conclusion Our data showed that the primary tumor volume had significantly impacted on the prognosis of NPC patients treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
CHEN Chuan-ben*,PAN Jian-ji,CHEN Li-sha et al. Significance of primary tumor volume on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2012, 21(3): 205-208.
CHEN Chuan-ben*,PAN Jian-ji,CHEN Li-sha et al. Significance of primary tumor volume on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2012, 21(3): 205-208.
[1] Mukherji SK, Schmalfuss IM, Casteligns J, et al. Clinical applications of tumor volume measurements for predicting outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Neuroradiol,2004,25:1425-1432. [2] Chen SW, Yang SN, Liang JA, et al. Value of computed tomography-based tumor volume as a predictor of outcomes in hypopharyngeal cancer after treatment with definitive radiotherapy. Laryngoscope,2006,116:2012-2017. [3] Shen C, Lu J, Gu Y, et al. Prognostic impact of primary tumorvolume in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by
definitive radiation therapy. Laryngoscope,2008,118:1206-1210. [4] Lee CC, Chu ST, Ho HC, et al. Primary tumor volume calculation as a predictive factor of prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Oto-Laryngologica,2008,128:93-97. [5] Chen Mk, Chen TH, Liu JP, et al. Better prediction of prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using primary tumor volume. Cancer,2004,100:2160-2166. [6] Chen C, Fei Z, Pan J, et al. Significance of primary tumor volume and T-stage on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol,2011,41:537-542. [7] Gospodarowicz MK, Miller D, Groome PA, et al. The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer,2004,100:1-5. [8] 中国鼻咽癌临床分期工作委员会. 鼻咽癌′92分期修订工作报告.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18:2-6. [9] American joint committee on cancer. AJCC cancer staging handbook from the AJCC cancer staging manual.7th ed. New York:Springer,2009. [10] Zhou JY, Chong VF, Khoo JB, et al. The relationship between nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor volume and TNM T-classification:a quantitative analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2007,264:169-174. [11] Chu ST, Wu PH, Hou YY, et al. Primary tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:significance for recurrence and survival. J Chin Med Assoc,2008,71:461-466. [12] Willner J, Baier K, Pfreundner L, et al. Tumor volume and local control in primary radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Oncol,1999,38:1025-1030. [13] Lin S, Pan J, Han L, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiotherapy report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009,75:1071-1078. [14] Lee CC, Huang TT, Lee MS, et al. Clinical application of tumor volume in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma to predict outcome. Radiat Oncol,2010,5:20.