[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Effect of different cone-beam CT image-guidance strategies on the accumulated dose of radiotherapy for spine metastases
Jia Chenghao1, Zhao Bo2,3, Gao Xianshu1, Zhang Min1, Gao Yan1, Liu Siwei1, Shang Zhaocai1, Li Yue1, Liu Peilin1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China; 2Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effect of setup errors from daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accumulated dose under different image-guidance (IG) strategies, aiming to investigate the appropriate IG strategies during radiotherapy for the spine metastases. Methods A total of 720 CBCT scans of 36 vertebral lesions were obtained. All 36 lesions were divided into the simultaneous boosting (PTV 40Gy/20f, GTV 60Gy/20f, n=20) and conventional radiotherapy groups (PTV 40Gy/20f, n=16). The actual fractionated plan was recalculated simulatively after transferring the isocenter of the initial plan according to the interfraction setup error. Under no daily image-guidance (no-DIG) strategies including twice imaging guidance weekly (TIG), initial 5 days then weekly imaging guidance (5D+WIG), WIG and no imaging guidance (NIG), the dose deviation was calculated between the delivered dose accumulated by each actual fractionated plan and the dose distribution under DIG. The tolerance of dose deviation for the target was within ±5% and the Dmax of the spinal cord was limited below 45Gy. Results Under different image-guidance strategies of TIG, 5D+WIG, WIG and NIG, the median dose deviation was approximately ±1% for the CTV D95% and Dmax of spinal cord. However, the median dose deviation wasbeyond-5% for the PTV D95% when conventional radiotherapy was given. The median dose deviation was approximately 10% for the Dmax of spinal cord and the proportion of cases whose maximum irradiated dose of spinal cord was more than 4500 cGy was ≥70%. Also, the median dose deviation was beyond -5% for the GTV D95% and PTV D95% when simultaneous boosting was delivered. Conclusions Because the dose deviation of CTVand spinal cord is within the tolerance limit, the image-guidance strategies could be chosen according to the clinical practice when conventional radiotherapy is delivered. However, the dose deviation of spinal cord, GTV and PTV exceeds the tolerance limit under no-DIG strategieswhen simultaneous boosting is delivered. Hence, it is necessary to perform daily IGRT for the spine metastases.
Jia Chenghao,Zhao Bo,Gao Xianshu et al. Effect of different cone-beam CT image-guidance strategies on the accumulated dose of radiotherapy for spine metastases[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2021, 30(5): 475-480.
Jia Chenghao,Zhao Bo,Gao Xianshu et al. Effect of different cone-beam CT image-guidance strategies on the accumulated dose of radiotherapy for spine metastases[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2021, 30(5): 475-480.
[1] Yao A, Sarkiss CA, Ladner TR, et al. Contemporary spinal oncology treatment paradigms and outcomes for metastatic tumors to the spine:A systematic review of breast, prostate, renal, and lung metastases[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2017, 41(1):11-23. DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.004. [2] Loblaw DA, Laperriere NJ, Mackillop WJ. A population-based study of malignant spinal cord compression in Ontario[J]. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 2003, 15(4):211-217. DOI:10.1016/s0936-6555(02)00400-4. [3] Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET):a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10185):2051-2058. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32487-5. [4] Lubgan D, Ziegaus A, Semrau S, et al. Effective local control of vertebral metastases by simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy:preliminary results[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2015, 191(3):264-271. DOI:10.1007/s00066-014-0780-4. [5] Zeng KL, Tseng CL, Soliman H, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic spine metastases:an overview[J]. Front Oncol, 2019, 9:337. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2019.00337. [6] National Radiotherapy Implementation Group. Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) guidance for implementation and use[S]. National Health Service, 2012. [7] Yao SY, Zhang Y, Nie K, et al. Setup uncertainties and the optimal imaging schedule in the prone position whole breast radiotherapy[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2019, 14(1):76. DOI:10.1186/s13014-019-1282-4. [8] Kaur I, Rawat S, Ahlawat P, et al. Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy[J]. J Med Phys, 2016, 41(2):144-148. DOI:10.4103/0971-6203.181640. [9] ICRU Report83[S].International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,2010.DOI:10.1093/jicru/10.1. Report83. [10] Wang H, Shiu A, Wang C, et al. Dosimetric effect of translational and rotational errors for patients undergoing image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 71(4):1261-1271. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.074. [11] Li W, Sahgal A, Foote M, et al. Impact of immobilization on intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 84(2):520-526. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.039. [12] Hyde D, Lochray F, Korol R, et al. Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizing cone-beam CT image-guidance with a robotic couch:intrafraction motion analysis accounting for all six degrees of freedom[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 82(3):e555-562. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1980. [13] Gupta M, Gamre P, Kannan S, et al. Effect of imaging frequency on PTV margins and geographical miss during image guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer[J]. Pract Radiat Oncol, 2018, 8(2):e41-e47. DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2017.09.010. [14] Higgins J, Bezjak A, Hope A, et al. Effect of image-guidance frequency on geometric accuracy and setup margins in radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011, 80(5):1330-1337. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.006. [15] Kupelian PA, Lee C, Langen KM, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance strategies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 70(4):1151-1157. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2371. [16] Splinter M, Sachpazidis I, Bostel T, et al. Dosimetric impact of the positional imaging frequency for hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy–a voxel-by-voxel analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10:564068. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.564068. [17] Schultheiss TE. The radiation dose-response of the human spinal cord[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 71(5):1455-1459. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.075.
2021, Vol. 30 
