[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
A verification study of Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy
Liu Min, Wang Xianliang, Yuan Ke, Wan Bin, Yang Feng, Kang Shengwei, Li Jie, Wang Pei
Department of Radiation Oncology,Sichuan Cancer Hospital,School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610041,China
AbstractObjective To investigate the Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy. Methods Six types of applicators were selected in this study which included stainless steel interstitial needle (Part#083.062),proguide round needle (Part#189.608),proguide sharp needle (Part#189.601),vaginal multi-channel applicator (Part#110.800),fletcher CT/MR applicator (Part#189.745) and henschke titanium applicator (Part#110.437). According to the sources imaging in the fluorography film, the distance of applicators between the first dwell position and the top could be measured. Marker was pasted on the surface of applicator corresponding to the first dwell position. And then the applicator was put into the pelvic phantom for a CT scan. During applicator reconstruction in the treatment planning system, the Offset values of all applicators could be acquired through adjusting the value of offset to superimpose the first dwell and the marker images. On account of the density of plastic material applicators were similar to human tissues, it was difficult to reconstruct the top of the applicator. With the help of stopper or simulation source, the value of offset could be acquired for plastic material applicators. Based on the measurement results, the differences were analyzed among different applicators. Results The Offset values significantly differed among various applicators. The Offset value for stainless steel interstitial needle was -11.4 mm,-4.1 mm for proguide round needle,-3.5 mm for proguide sharp needle, 0 mm or -5.0 mm for vaginal multi-channel applicator,-6.5 mm for fletcher CT/MR applicator and -7.5 mm for henschke titanium applicator, respectively. Conclusion To adapt to the rapid development of precise radiotherapy, it is necessary to verify the Offset value in afterloading brachytherapy.
Fund:Key Research & Development Projects of National(2017YFC0113100)
Corresponding Authors:
Kang Shengwei,Email:275708926@qq.com
Cite this article:
Liu Min,Wang Xianliang,Yuan Ke et al. A verification study of Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2020, 29(2): 126-130.
Liu Min,Wang Xianliang,Yuan Ke et al. A verification study of Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2020, 29(2): 126-130.
[1] Schindel J,Zhang W,Bhatia SK,et al. Dosimetric impacts of applicator displacements and applicator reconstruction-uncertainties on 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer[J]. J Contemp Brachyther,2013,5(4):250. DOI:10.5114/jcb.2013.39453.
[2] Tanderup K,Hellebust TP,Lang S,et al. Consequences of random and systematic reconstruction uncertainties in 3D image based brachytherapy in cervical cancer[J]. Radiother Oncol,2008,89(2):156-163. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.010.
[3] Stewart A,Parashar B,Patel M,et al. American brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer[J]. Brachytherapy,2016,15(1):1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2015.09.006.
[4] Wang X,Li J,Wang P,et al. Image guided radiation therapy boost in combination with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer[J]. J Contemp Brachyther,2016,8(2):122. DOI:10.5114/jcb.2016.59282.
[5] Damato AL,Cormack RA,Viswanathan AN. Characterization of implant displacement and deformation in gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy[J]. Brachytherapy,2014,13(1):100-109. DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2013.09.010.
[6] 王先良,袁珂,康盛伟,等. 环形施源器重建偏差对宫颈癌患者剂量影响分析[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2017,26(3):316-319.10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.03.014.
Wang XL,Yuan K,Kang SW,et al. Analysis of the effect of ring reconstructive bias on the dose of cervical cancer patients[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol,2017,26(3):316-319.10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.03.014.
[7] 张书旭,李文华,徐海荣,等. TLD和仿真盆腔模型核查宫颈癌后装治疗三维剂量分布的研究[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2005,14(3):167-169.10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714x.2005.03.003.
Zhang SX,Li WH,Xu HR,et al. Study on TLD and simulated pelvic models to verify the distribution of three-dimensional dose stos of post-installed treatment for cervical cancer. Chin J Radiol Heal,2005,14(3):167-169.10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714x.2005.03.003.
[8] Hung J,Shen S,Jennifer F,et al. Image-based 3D treatment planning for vaginal cylinder brachytherapy:dosimetric effects of bladder filling on organs at risk[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol,2012,83(3):980-985. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.023.
2020, Vol. 29 
