[an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Effect of different therapeutic methods on survival of stage Ⅰ-ⅡA cervical cancer patients complicated with postoperative intermediate risk factors
Ji Wei1, Ran Li1,2,3, Chang Jianying2,3, Li Fenghu2,3, Li Jiehui2,3, Liu Guangrong1, Yu Miao1
1Department of Gynecology Oncology, Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,China; 2Department of Oncology,Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,China; 3Department of Mammary Gynecology,Guizhou Cancer Hospital,Guiyang 550004,China
AbstractObjective To compare the effect of different therapeutic Methods upon the survival of stage Ⅰ-ⅡA cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors and explore the optimal treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.Methods Clinical data of 323 patients with the following intermediate risk factors of lymphovascular space invasion, depth of stromal invasion or tumor size>4 cm were retrospectively analyzed. The impact of observing (NT),chemotherapy (CT),radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on survival was statistically compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to survival analysis,and log-rank test difference,Cox model was used to prognostic factor analysis.Results The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 79.0% and 84.8%. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that TS> 4 cm and therapeutic method were the independent prognostic factors of PFS. The number of risk factors and therapeutic method were the independent prognostic factors of OS. In the whole group, both RT and CCRT could improve the prognosis of patients with no statistical significance (P>0.05). In the subgroup analysis, for patients with a single intermediate risk factor (low risk group), CT could significantly prolong the PFS (P=0.026) rather the 5-year OS (P=0.692). Compared with NT and CT, RT and CCRT could improve the PFS and OS, whereas no statistical significance was noted between the RT and CCRT (both P>0.05). For those with ≥2 risk factors (high risk group), CCRT could significantly prolong the PFS compared with CT (84.9% vs. 70%;P=0.006), but did not improve the OS (P=0.107). Compared with RT, CCRT could significantly improve the PFS and OS (both P<0.05).Conclusions For patients with only one risk factor, RT can enhance the clinical prognosis. CCRT can improve the clinical prognosis of stage Ⅰ-ⅡA cervical cancer patients with ≥2 risk factors.
Corresponding Authors:
Ran Li,Email:ranli171@hotmail.com
Cite this article:
Ji Wei,Ran Li,Chang Jianying et al. Effect of different therapeutic methods on survival of stage Ⅰ-ⅡA cervical cancer patients complicated with postoperative intermediate risk factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2019, 28(5): 358-363.
Ji Wei,Ran Li,Chang Jianying et al. Effect of different therapeutic methods on survival of stage Ⅰ-ⅡA cervical cancer patients complicated with postoperative intermediate risk factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2019, 28(5): 358-363.
[1]Samlal RA,van der Velden J,Schilthuis MS,et al. Identification of high-risk groups among node-positive patients with stage ⅠB and ⅡA cervical carcinoma[J].Gynecol Oncol,1997,64(3):463-467.DOI:10.1006/gyno.1996.4576. [2]Van de Putte G,Lie AK,Vach W,et al. Risk grouping in stage ⅠB squamous cell cervical carcinoma[J].Gynecol Oncol,2005,99(1):106-112.DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.026. [3]Sedlis A,Bundy BN,Rotman MZ,et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage ⅠB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study[J].Gynecol Oncol,1999,73(2):177-183.DOI:10.1006/gyno.1999.5387. [4]Ryu SY,Park SI,Nam BH,et al. Is adjuvant chemoradiotherapy overtreatment in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors?[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,79(3):794-799.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.019. [5]Ryu SY,Kim MH,Nam BH,et al. Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy:a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study[J].Br J Cancer,2014,110(2):278-285.DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.716. [6]Davila FR,Rob VO,Buist MR,et al. Post-operative radiotherapy in patients with early stage cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2014,134(1):52-59.DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.045. [7]Scandurra G,Scibilia G,Banna GL,et al. Efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel,ifosfamide,and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma[J].J Gynecol Oncol,2015,26(1):118-124.DOI:10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.118. [8]Delgado G,Bundy B,Zaino R,et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage ⅠB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix:a gynecologic oncology group study[J].Gynecol Oncol,1990,38(3):352-357.DOI:10.1016/0090-8258(90)90072-S. [9]Sun HY,Tang Q,Chen JH,et al. Cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs. adjuvant radiation in stage ⅠB/ⅡA cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors,treated with radical surgery:a retrospective study[J].Oncol Targ Ther,2018, 6(11):1149-1155.DOI:10.2147/OTT.S158214. [10]Stehman FB,Bundy BN,DiSaia PJ,et al. Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I.A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the gynecologic oncology group[J].Cancer-am Cancer,1991,67(11):2776-2785.DOI:10.1002/cncr.2820710439. [11]Yang K,Park W,Huh SJ,et al. Clinical outcomes in patients treated with radiotherapy after surgery for cervical cancer[J].Radiat Oncol J,2017,35(1):39-47.DOI:10.3857/roj.2016.01893. [12]Hosaka M,Watari H,Takeda M,et al. Treatment of cervical cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2008,34(4):552-556.DOI:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00739.x. [13]Takeshima N,Umayahara K,Fujiwara K,et al. Treatment Results of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy for intermediate-and high-risk stage ⅠB-ⅡA cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2006,103(2):618-622.DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.019. [14]Stehman FB,Ali S,Keys HM,et al. Radiation therapy with or without weekly cisplatin for bulky stage 1B cervical carcinoma:follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group trial[J].Am J Obstel Gynecol,2007,197(1):1-6.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.003. [15]唐秋,屠晔强,陈建红.同步放化疗治疗早期宫颈癌术后中危患者的疗效分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2018,40(6):462-466.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.06.012. Tang Q,Tu YQ,Chen JH.Therapeutic effect of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy on patients with early cervical cancer after operation[J].Chin J Oncol,2018,40(6):462-466.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.06.012. [16]Stehman FB,Ali S,Keys HM,et al. Radiation therapy with or without weekly cisplatin for bulky stage 1B cervical carcinoma:follow-up of a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007,197(5):503.e1-6.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.003. [17]Nakamura K,Kitahara Y,Satoh T,et al. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage ⅠB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC study)[J].World J Surg Oncol,2016,14(1):173.DOI:10.1186/s12957-016-0931-4.